CSVZX vs. THPGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CSVZX (Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class) and THPGX (Thompson LargeCap Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CSVZX returned 13.37%/yr vs 14.89%/yr for THPGX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSVZX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for THPGX.

Performance

CSVZX vs. THPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (CSVZX) and Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSVZX achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than THPGX's 12.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CSVZX has underperformed THPGX with an annualized return of 13.37%, while THPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.89% annualized return.

CSVZX

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 13.56%
• 6M: 17.04%
• 1Y: 37.24%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: 11.73%
• 10Y*: 13.37%

THPGX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 4.18%
• YTD: 12.02%
• 6M: 14.47%
• 1Y: 40.27%
• 3Y*: 22.75%
• 5Y*: 12.38%
• 10Y*: 14.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSVZX vs. THPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CSVZX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class	13.56%	27.92%	12.82%	5.78%	-0.84%	26.61%	6.43%	26.89%	-12.12%	19.05%
THPGX Thompson LargeCap Fund	12.02%	27.10%	17.14%	22.06%	-15.78%	28.09%	15.49%	33.59%	-12.31%	18.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CSVZX and THPGX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011	0.91

The correlation between CSVZX and THPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CSVZX vs. THPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSVZX

CSVZX Risk / Return Rank: 89
CSVZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CSVZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CSVZX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CSVZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CSVZX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

THPGX

THPGX Risk / Return Rank: 92
THPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
THPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
THPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
THPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
THPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSVZX vs. THPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (CSVZX) and Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSVZX	THPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.25	3.31	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.50	4.60	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.60	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.24	5.04	-0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.44	20.55	-3.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSVZX vs. THPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSVZX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is comparable to the THPGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSVZX and THPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSVZX	THPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.25	3.31	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.70	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.75	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.50	+0.18

Drawdowns

CSVZX vs. THPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSVZX drawdown since its inception was -41.46%, smaller than the maximum THPGX drawdown of -65.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSVZX and THPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSVZX	THPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.46%	-65.52%	+24.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.00%	-8.16%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.76%	-18.75%	+3.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.36%	-26.49%	+8.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.46%	-40.68%	-0.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.76%	-9.58%	+4.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	2.00%	+0.19%

Volatility

CSVZX vs. THPGX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (CSVZX) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX) at 2.63%. This indicates that CSVZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSVZX	THPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	2.63%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.81%	8.86%	-0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.77%	12.41%	-0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.90%	17.75%	-1.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.69%	19.94%	-1.25%

CSVZX vs. THPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSVZX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than THPGX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSVZX vs. THPGX - Dividend Comparison

CSVZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.32%, more than THPGX's 5.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSVZX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class	7.32%	8.31%	3.54%	3.67%	1.56%	5.89%	7.41%	6.92%	4.95%	3.73%	6.95%	4.61%
THPGX Thompson LargeCap Fund	5.00%	5.60%	11.97%	8.38%	5.06%	4.95%	0.90%	2.73%	0.89%	0.82%	0.80%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSVZX and THPGX in my portfolio?

CSVZX and THPGX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSVZX or THPGX?

CSVZX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to THPGX (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSVZX dropped -41.46% vs THPGX's -65.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 3.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.