PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSVZX vs. SMGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSVZX vs. SMGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (CSVZX) and Columbia Contrarian Core Fund (SMGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSVZX achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than SMGIX's 10.46% return. Over the past 10 years, CSVZX has underperformed SMGIX with an annualized return of 13.37%, while SMGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.78% annualized return.


CSVZX

1D
0.74%
1M
5.28%
YTD
13.56%
6M
17.04%
1Y
37.24%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
13.37%

SMGIX

1D
0.05%
1M
6.24%
YTD
10.46%
6M
10.80%
1Y
27.40%
3Y*
22.05%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSVZX vs. SMGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSVZX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class
13.56%27.92%12.82%5.78%-0.84%26.61%6.43%26.89%-12.12%19.05%
SMGIX
Columbia Contrarian Core Fund
10.46%17.35%23.33%32.12%-18.64%24.18%22.21%32.95%-8.95%20.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CSVZX and SMGIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.85

The correlation between CSVZX and SMGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (3 years) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSVZX vs. SMGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSVZX
CSVZX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CSVZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSVZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSVZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CSVZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSVZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SMGIX
SMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSVZX vs. SMGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (CSVZX) and Columbia Contrarian Core Fund (SMGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSVZXSMGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.42

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

2.85

+1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.44

11.72

+5.72

CSVZX vs. SMGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSVZX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the SMGIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSVZX and SMGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSVZXSMGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

2.34

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.71

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.78

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.70

-0.03

Drawdowns

CSVZX vs. SMGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSVZX drawdown since its inception was -41.46%, smaller than the maximum SMGIX drawdown of -50.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSVZX and SMGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSVZXSMGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.46%

-50.62%

+9.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-9.99%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.76%

-19.92%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.36%

-32.20%

+13.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.46%

-32.45%

-9.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-6.74%

+1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.42%

-0.23%

Volatility

CSVZX vs. SMGIX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (CSVZX) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Columbia Contrarian Core Fund (SMGIX) at 3.03%. This indicates that CSVZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSVZXSMGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

3.03%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.81%

9.05%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.77%

12.18%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

18.98%

-3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.69%

18.98%

-0.29%

CSVZX vs. SMGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSVZX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SMGIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSVZX vs. SMGIX - Dividend Comparison

CSVZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.32%, more than SMGIX's 6.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSVZX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class
7.32%8.31%3.54%3.67%1.56%5.89%7.41%6.92%4.95%3.73%6.95%4.61%
SMGIX
Columbia Contrarian Core Fund
6.69%7.39%9.69%3.08%10.61%13.70%7.69%5.87%10.17%4.89%0.76%5.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSVZX and SMGIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSVZX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to SMGIX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSVZX dropped -41.46% vs SMGIX's -50.62%.

CSVZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSVZX and SMGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer