PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSVFX vs. GIOTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSVFX vs. GIOTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia International Dividend Income Fund (CSVFX) and GMO International Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GIOTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSVFX achieves a 15.20% return, which is significantly lower than GIOTX's 16.73% return. Over the past 10 years, CSVFX has underperformed GIOTX with an annualized return of 9.32%, while GIOTX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.88% annualized return.


CSVFX

1D
-0.56%
1M
-3.94%
6M
12.18%
YTD
15.20%
1Y
29.54%
3Y*
17.49%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*
9.32%
ALL TIME*
9.32%

GIOTX

1D
-0.68%
1M
-2.07%
6M
13.84%
YTD
16.73%
1Y
36.69%
3Y*
24.94%
5Y*
14.55%
10Y*
11.88%
ALL TIME*
6.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSVFX vs. GIOTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSVFX
Columbia International Dividend Income Fund
15.20%31.32%2.36%18.44%-14.91%13.73%5.87%24.47%-12.96%20.13%
GIOTX
GMO International Developed Equity Allocation Fund
16.73%43.70%10.66%21.03%-12.41%11.14%7.43%24.45%-19.66%26.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CSVFX and GIOTX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007

0.90

The correlation between CSVFX and GIOTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSVFX vs. GIOTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSVFX
CSVFX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CSVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CSVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GIOTX
GIOTX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GIOTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIOTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIOTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GIOTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIOTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSVFX vs. GIOTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Dividend Income Fund (CSVFX) and GMO International Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GIOTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSVFXGIOTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

3.52

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.64

13.60

-3.95

CSVFX vs. GIOTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSVFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the GIOTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSVFX and GIOTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSVFX vs. GIOTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSVFX drawdown since its inception was -55.31%, roughly equal to the maximum GIOTX drawdown of -56.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSVFX and GIOTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSVFXGIOTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.31%

-56.51%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.72%

-10.66%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-13.40%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.11%

-28.34%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.50%

-39.29%

+5.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-2.39%

-1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-14.15%

+6.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.76%

+0.37%

Volatility

CSVFX vs. GIOTX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia International Dividend Income Fund (CSVFX) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to GMO International Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GIOTX) at 4.64%. This indicates that CSVFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIOTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSVFXGIOTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.43%

4.64%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.96%

13.29%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.99%

16.10%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

15.49%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

16.14%

-0.05%

CSVFX vs. GIOTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSVFX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GIOTX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSVFX vs. GIOTX - Dividend Comparison

CSVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than GIOTX's 8.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSVFX
Columbia International Dividend Income Fund
4.34%4.81%6.96%3.56%1.93%9.05%3.57%3.44%5.53%2.94%3.52%3.19%
GIOTX
GMO International Developed Equity Allocation Fund
8.73%8.04%5.07%6.54%4.45%6.67%4.48%3.74%3.90%3.15%4.04%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, CSVFX and GIOTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CSVFX has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to GIOTX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSVFX dropped -55.31% vs GIOTX's -56.51%.

GIOTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSVFX and GIOTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer