PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CSVFX vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CSVFX and VOO is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

CSVFX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia International Dividend Income Fund (CSVFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.58%
10.08%
CSVFX
VOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CSVFX:

0.32

VOO:

1.88

Sortino Ratio

CSVFX:

0.49

VOO:

2.53

Omega Ratio

CSVFX:

1.07

VOO:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

CSVFX:

0.32

VOO:

2.81

Martin Ratio

CSVFX:

0.84

VOO:

11.78

Ulcer Index

CSVFX:

5.16%

VOO:

2.02%

Daily Std Dev

CSVFX:

13.68%

VOO:

12.67%

Max Drawdown

CSVFX:

-59.58%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

CSVFX:

-6.89%

VOO:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSVFX achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 4.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CSVFX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 3.40%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.


CSVFX

YTD

6.16%

1M

4.70%

6M

-3.58%

1Y

3.79%

5Y*

3.14%

10Y*

3.40%

VOO

YTD

4.61%

1M

2.59%

6M

10.08%

1Y

25.10%

5Y*

14.79%

10Y*

13.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CSVFX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSVFX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


CSVFX
Columbia International Dividend Income Fund
Expense ratio chart for CSVFX: current value at 1.01% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.01%
Expense ratio chart for VOO: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CSVFX vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSVFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CSVFX is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CSVFX is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CSVFX is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CSVFX is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CSVFX is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CSVFX is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CSVFX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Dividend Income Fund (CSVFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CSVFX, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.321.88
The chart of Sortino ratio for CSVFX, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.492.53
The chart of Omega ratio for CSVFX, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.071.35
The chart of Calmar ratio for CSVFX, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.322.81
The chart of Martin ratio for CSVFX, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.000.8411.78
CSVFX
VOO

The current CSVFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSVFX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.32
1.88
CSVFX
VOO

Dividends

CSVFX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CSVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CSVFX
Columbia International Dividend Income Fund
2.47%2.62%2.64%1.93%2.46%1.61%2.68%3.25%2.94%3.52%3.20%4.05%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.19%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

CSVFX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSVFX drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSVFX and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.89%
0
CSVFX
VOO

Volatility

CSVFX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Columbia International Dividend Income Fund (CSVFX) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.01%. This indicates that CSVFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.51%
3.01%
CSVFX
VOO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab