CSVFX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia International Dividend Income Fund (CSVFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
CSVFX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 8, 2000. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
CSVFX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSVFX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSVFX Columbia International Dividend Income Fund | 1.51% | 31.32% | 2.36% | 18.44% | -14.91% | 13.73% | 5.87% | 24.47% | -12.96% | 20.13% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSVFX achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, CSVFX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.44%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.
CSVFX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -11.50%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 25.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.44%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSVFX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSVFX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSVFX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
CSVFX
VOO
CSVFX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Dividend Income Fund (CSVFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSVFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.50 | 0.98 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 1.50 | +0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.23 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 1.53 | +0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 7.29 | +0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSVFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 0.98 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.70 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.78 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.83 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSVFX and VOO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSVFX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
CSVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSVFX Columbia International Dividend Income Fund | 4.86% | 4.81% | 6.96% | 3.56% | 1.93% | 9.05% | 3.57% | 3.44% | 5.53% | 2.94% | 3.52% | 3.19% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
CSVFX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSVFX drawdown since its inception was -55.31%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSVFX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSVFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.31% | -33.99% | -21.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | -11.98% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.11% | -24.52% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.50% | -33.99% | +0.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.50% | -6.29% | -5.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.05% | -3.72% | -4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.52% | +0.47% |
Volatility
CSVFX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Columbia International Dividend Income Fund (CSVFX) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that CSVFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSVFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 5.29% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.74% | 9.44% | +1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.37% | 18.10% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 16.82% | -1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 17.99% | -2.02% |