CSUS.L vs. USDV.L
CSUS.L (iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc) and USDV.L (SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - CSUS.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while USDV.L tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSUS.L returned 15.32%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for USDV.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSUS.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for USDV.L.
Performance
CSUS.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSUS.L is traded in USD, while USDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USDV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUS.L achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly lower than USDV.L's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUS.L has outperformed USDV.L with an annualized return of 15.32%, while USDV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.39% annualized return.
CSUS.L
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- 1Y
- 21.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.24%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
USDV.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 15.83%
- 3Y*
- 10.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
CSUS.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUS.L iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc | 7.31% | 17.22% | 25.29% | 27.68% | -20.12% | 27.06% | 20.30% | 30.38% | -5.82% | 21.41% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 9.74% | 8.78% | 7.52% | 1.58% | -0.37% | 25.59% | 0.26% | 23.70% | -4.23% | 15.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUS.L and USDV.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2011 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CSUS.L and USDV.L has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CSUS.L vs. USDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSUS.L
USDV.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
CSUS.L
USDV.L
Financial Services
CSUS.L
USDV.L
Communication Services
CSUS.L
USDV.L
Consumer Cyclical
CSUS.L
USDV.L
Industrials
CSUS.L
USDV.L
Healthcare
CSUS.L
USDV.L
Consumer Defensive
CSUS.L
USDV.L
Energy
CSUS.L
USDV.L
Utilities
CSUS.L
USDV.L
Basic Materials
CSUS.L
USDV.L
Real Estate
CSUS.L
USDV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSUS.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSUS.L
USDV.L
CSUS.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSUS.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.28 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 2.26 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | 5.57 | +4.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSUS.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, smaller than the maximum USDV.L drawdown of -38.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUS.L and USDV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUS.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.38% | -38.11% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -6.96% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.85% | -15.12% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -15.12% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.38% | -35.73% | +1.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -1.25% | -1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -6.61% | +2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 2.84% | -0.78% |
Volatility
CSUS.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) at 2.48%. This indicates that CSUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSUS.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 2.48% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 6.87% | +2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 9.68% | +2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 13.82% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 15.74% | +0.68% |
CSUS.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUS.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSUS.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison
CSUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUS.L iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 2.01% | 2.20% | 1.99% | 2.28% | 2.11% | 2.13% | 2.57% | 2.07% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.65% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSUS.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSUS.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSUS.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.
CSUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CSUS.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.
Find the right allocation for CSUS.L and USDV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer