CSUS.L vs. SUUS.L
CSUS.L (iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc) and SUUS.L (iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from iShares tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSUS.L returned 12.24%/yr vs 11.03%/yr for SUUS.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSUS.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SUUS.L.
Performance
CSUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSUS.L is traded in USD, while SUUS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SUUS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUS.L achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly lower than SUUS.L's 13.86% return.
CSUS.L
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- 1Y
- 21.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.24%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
SUUS.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 13.86%
- 6M
- 13.73%
- 1Y
- 23.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- —
CSUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUS.L iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc | 7.31% | 17.22% | 25.29% | 27.68% | -20.12% | 27.06% | 20.30% | 30.38% | -5.82% | 21.41% |
SUUS.L iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 13.86% | 11.25% | 13.92% | 23.78% | -18.70% | 31.68% | 25.25% | 32.47% | -2.94% | 23.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUS.L and SUUS.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2016 | 0.86 |
The correlation between CSUS.L and SUUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
CSUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSUS.L
SUUS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
CSUS.L
SUUS.L
Financial Services
CSUS.L
SUUS.L
Communication Services
CSUS.L
SUUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
CSUS.L
SUUS.L
Industrials
CSUS.L
SUUS.L
Healthcare
CSUS.L
SUUS.L
Consumer Defensive
CSUS.L
SUUS.L
Energy
CSUS.L
SUUS.L
Utilities
CSUS.L
SUUS.L
Basic Materials
CSUS.L
SUUS.L
Real Estate
CSUS.L
SUUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSUS.L vs. SUUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSUS.L
SUUS.L
CSUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSUS.L | SUUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 2.57 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | 9.93 | +0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, which is greater than SUUS.L's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUS.L and SUUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUS.L | SUUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.38% | -32.59% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -8.93% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.85% | -19.94% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -26.32% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -1.20% | -1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -7.47% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 2.32% | -0.26% |
Volatility
CSUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L) is 3.96%, while iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that CSUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSUS.L | SUUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 4.31% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 9.93% | -0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 12.60% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 21.17% | -4.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 20.59% | -4.17% |
CSUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUS.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SUUS.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSUS.L vs. SUUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSUS.L nor SUUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSUS.L and SUUS.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SUUS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUUS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CSUS.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CSUS.L and 0.20% for SUUS.L.
Find the right allocation for CSUS.L and SUUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer