CSUS.L vs. FSWD.L
CSUS.L (iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc) and FSWD.L (iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while FSWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the STOXX Developed World Equity Factor Screened Net Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSUS.L returned 14.58%/yr vs 11.78%/yr for FSWD.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSUS.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FSWD.L.
Performance
CSUS.L vs. FSWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSUS.L is traded in USD, while FSWD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FSWD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUS.L achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than FSWD.L's 12.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUS.L has outperformed FSWD.L with an annualized return of 14.58%, while FSWD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.78% annualized return.
CSUS.L
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.24%
- 10Y*
- 14.58%
FSWD.L
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 11.33%
- YTD
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 24.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
CSUS.L vs. FSWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUS.L iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc | 8.92% | 17.22% | 25.29% | 27.68% | -20.12% | 27.06% | 20.30% | 30.38% | -5.82% | 21.41% |
FSWD.L iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.04% | 26.00% | 16.89% | 14.80% | -15.51% | 21.00% | 10.16% | 22.35% | -12.59% | 26.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUS.L and FSWD.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2015 | 0.84 |
The correlation between CSUS.L and FSWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSUS.L vs. FSWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSUS.L
FSWD.L
CSUS.L vs. FSWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L) and iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSUS.L | FSWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 3.09 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.33 | 12.73 | -3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSUS.L vs. FSWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, smaller than the maximum FSWD.L drawdown of -41.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUS.L and FSWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUS.L | FSWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.38% | -41.16% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -7.98% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.85% | -18.85% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -25.01% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.38% | -34.31% | -0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -1.28% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -12.27% | +8.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.94% | +0.16% |
Volatility
CSUS.L vs. FSWD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L) and iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L) have volatilities of 3.07% and 3.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSUS.L | FSWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 3.11% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 9.67% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.25% | 12.17% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 20.20% | -3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 18.37% | -1.99% |
CSUS.L vs. FSWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUS.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FSWD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSUS.L vs. FSWD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSUS.L nor FSWD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSUS.L and FSWD.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FSWD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSWD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CSUS.L.
CSUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FSWD.L is Global Equities. CSUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FSWD.L tracks STOXX Developed World Equity Factor Screened Net Index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CSUS.L and 0.30% for FSWD.L.
Find the right allocation for CSUS.L and FSWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer