CSUS.L vs. DTLA.L
CSUS.L (iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc) and DTLA.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while DTLA.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSUS.L returned 13.29%/yr vs -6.06%/yr for DTLA.L. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. CSUS.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for DTLA.L.
Performance
CSUS.L vs. DTLA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUS.L achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly higher than DTLA.L's -0.98% return.
CSUS.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 27.52%
- 3Y*
- 22.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.12%
DTLA.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- -1.10%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- -1.52%
- 5Y*
- -6.06%
- 10Y*
- —
CSUS.L vs. DTLA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUS.L iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc | 10.32% | 17.22% | 25.83% | 26.72% | -20.46% | 28.02% | 20.30% | 30.38% | -7.80% |
DTLA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.98% | 4.47% | -6.97% | 1.69% | -30.29% | -4.46% | 17.00% | 15.69% | 3.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUS.L and DTLA.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018 | -0.09 |
The correlation between CSUS.L and DTLA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSUS.L vs. DTLA.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSUS.L
DTLA.L
CSUS.L vs. DTLA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSUS.L | DTLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.07 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 0.53 | +2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.91 | 1.34 | +12.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSUS.L | DTLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 0.41 | +1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | -0.41 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | -0.07 | +1.20 |
Drawdowns
CSUS.L vs. DTLA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, smaller than the maximum DTLA.L drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUS.L and DTLA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUS.L | DTLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.38% | -48.47% | +14.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -7.52% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.85% | -18.61% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -42.87% | +17.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -40.52% | +40.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -24.06% | +19.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.96% | -0.99% |
Volatility
CSUS.L vs. DTLA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) have volatilities of 3.25% and 3.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSUS.L | DTLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 3.37% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.62% | 6.53% | +2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 9.82% | +1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 14.93% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 14.78% | +2.36% |
CSUS.L vs. DTLA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUS.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than DTLA.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSUS.L vs. DTLA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSUS.L nor DTLA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSUS.L and DTLA.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DTLA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DTLA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CSUS.L.
CSUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DTLA.L is Government Bonds. CSUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while DTLA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CSUS.L and 0.07% for DTLA.L.
Find the right allocation for CSUS.L and DTLA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer