PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSUS.AS vs. CSPX.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSUS.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSUS.AS having a 11.31% return and CSPX.AS slightly higher at 11.52%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSUS.AS having a 14.77% annualized return and CSPX.AS not far ahead at 14.96%.


CSUS.AS

1D
-0.02%
1M
5.45%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.33%
1Y
25.43%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
14.34%
10Y*
14.77%

CSPX.AS

1D
-0.10%
1M
5.25%
YTD
11.52%
6M
11.45%
1Y
25.69%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
14.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSUS.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSUS.AS
iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.31%4.04%33.96%22.33%-15.27%37.95%10.18%32.81%-0.73%6.52%
CSPX.AS
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
11.52%4.00%33.87%22.28%-14.24%40.26%7.72%32.99%-0.36%7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CSUS.AS and CSPX.AS is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2014

0.97

The correlation between CSUS.AS and CSPX.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSUS.AS vs. CSPX.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSUS.AS
CSUS.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CSUS.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUS.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUS.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUS.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUS.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

CSPX.AS
CSPX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSUS.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSUS.ASCSPX.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

3.57

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.97

12.76

-0.79

CSUS.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSUS.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSUS.AS and CSPX.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSUS.ASCSPX.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.25

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.96

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.92

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.93

-0.02

Drawdowns

CSUS.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSUS.AS drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, roughly equal to the maximum CSPX.AS drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUS.AS and CSPX.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSUS.ASCSPX.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-33.65%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-7.11%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.49%

-23.37%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.49%

-23.37%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

-33.65%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.40%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-4.28%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.00%

+0.11%

Volatility

CSUS.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS) has a higher volatility of 2.74% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) at 2.59%. This indicates that CSUS.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSUS.ASCSPX.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

2.59%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

7.37%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

11.26%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

15.13%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

16.05%

+0.18%

CSUS.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSUS.AS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.AS's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSUS.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSUS.AS nor CSPX.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, CSUS.AS and CSPX.AS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CSPX.AS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSPX.AS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CSUS.AS.

CSUS.AS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CSPX.AS is S&P 500. CSUS.AS tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while CSPX.AS tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CSUS.AS and 0.07% for CSPX.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSUS.AS and CSPX.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer