PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CSUK.L vs. LCUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CSUK.L vs. LCUK.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CSUK.L (iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc)) and LCUK.L (Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, from iShares and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSUK.L returned 12.01%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for LCUK.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CSUK.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for LCUK.L.

Performance

CSUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSUK.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSUK.L is traded in GBp, while LCUK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the LCUK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSUK.L achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly higher than LCUK.L's 5.36% return.

CSUK.L

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
5.97%
6M
8.48%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
14.38%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
8.88%

LCUK.L

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.35%
YTD
5.36%
6M
4.67%
1Y
16.18%
3Y*
13.12%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CSUK.L
iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc)		5.97%25.26%8.91%6.86%7.23%18.18%-13.09%16.20%-0.68%
LCUK.L
Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist		5.36%21.01%9.05%7.25%2.15%18.06%-11.83%18.73%-0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CSUK.L and LCUK.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018

0.96

The correlation between CSUK.L and LCUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CSUK.L
LCUK.L

Financial Services

25.2%
24.2%

Healthcare

14.6%
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

13.5%
13.7%

Industrials

12.7%
13.9%

Energy

11.2%
11.1%

Basic Materials

9.7%
8.3%

Utilities

5.1%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
5.2%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.0%

Technology

0.6%
0.9%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.4%

Financial Services

CSUK.L
25.2%
LCUK.L
24.2%

Healthcare

CSUK.L
14.6%
LCUK.L
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

CSUK.L
13.5%
LCUK.L
13.7%

Industrials

CSUK.L
12.7%
LCUK.L
13.9%

Energy

CSUK.L
11.2%
LCUK.L
11.1%

Basic Materials

CSUK.L
9.7%
LCUK.L
8.3%

Utilities

CSUK.L
5.1%
LCUK.L
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CSUK.L
4.2%
LCUK.L
5.2%

Communication Services

CSUK.L
2.5%
LCUK.L
3.0%

Technology

CSUK.L
0.6%
LCUK.L
0.9%

Real Estate

CSUK.L
0.6%
LCUK.L
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc)

Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist

Often compared with CSUK.L:
CSUK.L vs. CUKX.LCSUK.L vs. MIDD.LCSUK.L vs. ^GSPCCSUK.L vs. EWUCSUK.L vs. VUKG.LCSUK.L vs. ISF.LCSUK.L vs. VUAG.L
Often compared with LCUK.L:
LCUK.L vs. LGUK.LLCUK.L vs. JURE.LLCUK.L vs. XASX.LLCUK.L vs. VUKG.LLCUK.L vs. SMGB.LLCUK.L vs. IITU.LLCUK.L vs. VUKE.L

Return for Risk

CSUK.L vs. LCUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CSUK.L
CSUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
CSUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
LCUK.L
LCUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSUK.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CSUK.LLCUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.89
1.35

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.64
1.89

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

1.76

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.37

5.69

+2.69

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSUK.L and LCUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CSUK.LLCUK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.35

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.76

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.50

-0.01

Drawdowns

CSUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSUK.L drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, roughly equal to the maximum LCUK.L drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUK.L and LCUK.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CSUK.LLCUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-35.54%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-9.13%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-12.65%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.65%

-12.65%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.18%

-4.49%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-4.97%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.84%

-0.31%

Volatility

CSUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSUK.L) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) at 3.88%. This indicates that CSUK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CSUK.LLCUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

3.88%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

10.20%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.17%

11.91%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.74%

12.96%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.08%

15.70%

-0.62%

CSUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSUK.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUK.L's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSUK.L nor LCUK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CSUK.L
iShares MSCI UK UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCUK.L
Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist		0.00%0.00%3.68%3.05%3.94%3.86%3.00%3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.92, CSUK.L and LCUK.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CSUK.L.

Both ETFs track FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CSUK.L and 0.04% for LCUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSUK.L and LCUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer