CSUIX vs. RGIYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX).
CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004. RGIYX is managed by Russell. It was launched on Sep 29, 2010.
Performance
CSUIX vs. RGIYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSUIX vs. RGIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund | 8.17% | 20.07% | 9.96% | 6.94% | -2.95% | 12.44% | -3.37% | 27.98% | -9.87% | 18.96% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CSUIX having a 8.44% return and RGIYX slightly lower at 8.17%. Over the past 10 years, CSUIX has underperformed RGIYX with an annualized return of 7.83%, while RGIYX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.38% annualized return.
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
RGIYX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- 1Y
- 22.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSUIX vs. RGIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than RGIYX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSUIX vs. RGIYX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUIX
RGIYX
CSUIX vs. RGIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSUIX | RGIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.86 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 2.41 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.38 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.68 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.58 | 12.86 | -2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSUIX | RGIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.86 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.77 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.52 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUIX and RGIYX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSUIX vs. RGIYX - Dividend Comparison
CSUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, less than RGIYX's 8.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund | 8.68% | 9.39% | 5.64% | 2.76% | 3.46% | 17.26% | 7.80% | 15.89% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 6.70% | 5.67% |
Drawdowns
CSUIX vs. RGIYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUIX drawdown since its inception was -52.01%, which is greater than RGIYX's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUIX and RGIYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUIX | RGIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.01% | -39.17% | -12.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.99% | -8.43% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.01% | -20.19% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.01% | -39.17% | +4.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -4.03% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -4.70% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 1.75% | +0.07% |
Volatility
CSUIX vs. RGIYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) is 3.24%, while Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that CSUIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSUIX | RGIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 3.96% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.90% | 6.94% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 12.04% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 13.45% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 15.90% | -1.02% |