CSUIX vs. MGIFX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CSUIX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.) and MGIFX (Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSUIX charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MGIFX.

Performance

CSUIX vs. MGIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (MGIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CSUIX

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 1.27%
• 6M: 13.03%
• YTD: 13.07%
• 1Y: 20.07%
• 3Y*: 12.76%
• 5Y*: 7.81%
• 10Y*: 7.67%

MGIFX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSUIX vs. MGIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.	13.07%	14.69%	8.74%	2.46%	-4.89%	16.60%	-1.29%	24.72%	0.40%
MGIFX Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund	13.34%	28.20%	-0.47%	7.88%	-3.61%	11.74%	-0.69%	31.06%	0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CSUIX and MGIFX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2018	0.83

The correlation between CSUIX and MGIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CSUIX vs. MGIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSUIX

CSUIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
CSUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
CSUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
CSUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
CSUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CSUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

MGIFX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSUIX vs. MGIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (MGIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSUIX	MGIFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.67	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CSUIX	MGIFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.13%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.87%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CSUIX	MGIFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.15%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.09%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.98%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.86%	—	—

CSUIX vs. MGIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSUIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than MGIFX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSUIX vs. MGIFX - Dividend Comparison

CSUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%, less than MGIFX's 49.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.	7.88%	8.41%	2.58%	2.53%	3.91%	3.25%	1.64%	1.83%	2.45%	5.12%	2.35%	6.52%
MGIFX Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund	49.24%	7.56%	3.17%	5.41%	8.60%	7.13%	6.18%	6.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSUIX and MGIFX in my portfolio?

CSUIX and MGIFX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.