CSUIX vs. GAMPX
CSUIX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.) and GAMPX (Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CSUIX returned 7.70%/yr vs 25.01%/yr for GAMPX. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CSUIX charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for GAMPX.
Performance
CSUIX vs. GAMPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUIX achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly lower than GAMPX's 26.40% return.
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 1Y
- 18.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- 7.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.67%
GAMPX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- 6M
- 17.53%
- YTD
- 26.40%
- 1Y
- 29.08%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 25.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CSUIX vs. GAMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 12.65% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -3.61% |
GAMPX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P | 26.40% | 5.43% | 58.40% | 15.11% | 19.15% | 38.33% | -17.23% | 17.00% | -12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUIX and GAMPX is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2018 | 0.57 |
The correlation between CSUIX and GAMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSUIX vs. GAMPX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUIX
GAMPX
CSUIX vs. GAMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P (GAMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSUIX | GAMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 4.16 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | 9.47 | +0.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSUIX vs. GAMPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUIX drawdown since its inception was -52.01%, smaller than the maximum GAMPX drawdown of -59.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUIX and GAMPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUIX | GAMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.01% | -59.18% | +7.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.96% | -7.23% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.74% | -17.08% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.01% | -21.97% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -3.00% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -8.44% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 3.17% | -1.30% |
Volatility
CSUIX vs. GAMPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) is 3.03%, while Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P (GAMPX) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that CSUIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSUIX | GAMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 5.37% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 11.91% | -3.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 14.88% | -4.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 20.48% | -7.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.87% | 25.70% | -10.83% |
CSUIX vs. GAMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than GAMPX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSUIX vs. GAMPX - Dividend Comparison
CSUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%, less than GAMPX's 8.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.91% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
GAMPX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P | 8.30% | 10.13% | 25.55% | 10.34% | 4.76% | 8.54% | 4.33% | 4.99% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSUIX and GAMPX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GAMPX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to CSUIX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSUIX dropped -52.01% vs GAMPX's -59.18%.
GAMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSUIX and GAMPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer