PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSUIX vs. CSRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSUIX vs. CSRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares (CSRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSUIX achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly lower than CSRIX's 11.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUIX has outperformed CSRIX with an annualized return of 7.73%, while CSRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.30% annualized return.


CSUIX

1D
1.22%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
9.60%
6M
8.98%
1Y
16.57%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
7.73%

CSRIX

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
11.61%
6M
10.52%
1Y
11.20%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
3.87%
10Y*
7.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSUIX vs. CSRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSUIX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.
9.60%14.69%8.74%2.46%-4.89%16.60%-1.29%24.72%-5.52%18.15%
CSRIX
Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares
11.61%3.10%6.26%12.75%-25.15%42.40%-2.55%36.11%-4.68%6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CSUIX and CSRIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.72

The correlation between CSUIX and CSRIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSUIX vs. CSRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSUIX
CSUIX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CSUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

CSRIX
CSRIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CSRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CSRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSUIX vs. CSRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares (CSRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSUIXCSRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.15

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

1.40

+1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

3.70

+5.79

CSUIX vs. CSRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSUIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the CSRIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSUIX and CSRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSUIXCSRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

0.81

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.21

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.36

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.35

+0.22

Drawdowns

CSUIX vs. CSRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSUIX drawdown since its inception was -52.01%, which is greater than CSRIX's maximum drawdown of -41.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUIX and CSRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSUIXCSRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.01%

-41.45%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.96%

-7.74%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.89%

-16.89%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.01%

-31.79%

+11.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.01%

-41.45%

+6.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.34%

-2.89%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-8.80%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

2.92%

-1.15%

Volatility

CSUIX vs. CSRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) is 3.11%, while Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares (CSRIX) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that CSUIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSUIXCSRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

3.71%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

10.13%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.68%

13.45%

-3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.97%

18.59%

-5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.90%

20.49%

-5.59%

CSUIX vs. CSRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSUIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than CSRIX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSUIX vs. CSRIX - Dividend Comparison

CSUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, more than CSRIX's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSRIX
Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares
2.87%3.14%2.97%3.04%4.28%3.87%4.91%12.97%5.45%6.28%12.61%13.63%
CSUIX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.
7.67%8.41%2.58%2.53%3.91%3.25%1.64%1.83%2.45%5.12%2.35%6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSUIX and CSRIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSRIX has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to CSUIX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSUIX dropped -52.01% vs CSRIX's -41.45%.

CSUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSUIX and CSRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer