CSUIX vs. BGLYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX).
CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004. BGLYX is managed by Brookfield Investment Funds. It was launched on Nov 29, 2011.
Performance
CSUIX vs. BGLYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSUIX vs. BGLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
BGLYX Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 8.53% | 13.04% | 9.01% | 3.32% | -5.47% | 16.13% | -3.25% | 25.44% | -8.06% | 10.79% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSUIX having a 8.44% return and BGLYX slightly higher at 8.53%. Over the past 10 years, CSUIX has outperformed BGLYX with an annualized return of 7.83%, while BGLYX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.28% annualized return.
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
BGLYX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 6M
- 9.80%
- 1Y
- 17.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.89%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 7.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSUIX vs. BGLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLYX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSUIX vs. BGLYX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUIX
BGLYX
CSUIX vs. BGLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSUIX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.52 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 2.04 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.45 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.58 | 9.89 | +0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSUIX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.52 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.61 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.47 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.48 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUIX and BGLYX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSUIX vs. BGLYX - Dividend Comparison
CSUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, less than BGLYX's 28.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
BGLYX Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 28.55% | 30.30% | 1.89% | 1.88% | 7.34% | 4.53% | 3.71% | 3.94% | 4.31% | 4.03% | 4.09% | 4.03% |
Drawdowns
CSUIX vs. BGLYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUIX drawdown since its inception was -52.01%, which is greater than BGLYX's maximum drawdown of -36.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUIX and BGLYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUIX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.01% | -36.54% | -15.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.99% | -7.55% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.01% | -20.94% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.01% | -36.54% | +1.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -4.56% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -7.92% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 1.87% | -0.05% |
Volatility
CSUIX vs. BGLYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) is 3.24%, while Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that CSUIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGLYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSUIX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 3.90% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.90% | 7.35% | -0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 12.09% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 13.46% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 15.62% | -0.74% |