CSUAX vs. GLIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX).
CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017. GLIFX is managed by Lazard.
Performance
CSUAX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSUAX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 5.89% | 23.85% | 6.71% | 10.89% | -1.33% | 19.91% | -4.51% | 22.27% | -3.82% | 20.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUAX achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly higher than GLIFX's 5.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUAX has underperformed GLIFX with an annualized return of 7.48%, while GLIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
GLIFX
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSUAX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSUAX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUAX
GLIFX
CSUAX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSUAX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 2.23 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 2.83 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.43 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.74 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 11.44 | -1.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSUAX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 2.23 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 1.14 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.75 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.85 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUAX and GLIFX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSUAX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison
CSUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than GLIFX's 6.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 6.37% | 6.22% | 4.26% | 2.95% | 14.81% | 6.21% | 2.59% | 4.44% | 14.29% | 6.94% | 1.91% | 11.33% |
Drawdowns
CSUAX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUAX drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, which is greater than GLIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAX and GLIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUAX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.20% | -29.65% | -22.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.98% | -9.00% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.45% | -17.15% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.05% | -29.65% | -5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -7.05% | +2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.49% | -3.35% | -5.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 2.16% | -0.33% |
Volatility
CSUAX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) is 3.26%, while Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that CSUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSUAX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 4.58% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.89% | 7.35% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.48% | 10.71% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 10.70% | +2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 13.25% | +1.64% |