CSUAX vs. CAEIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX).
CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017. CAEIX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on May 30, 2007.
Performance
CSUAX vs. CAEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSUAX vs. CAEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund | 4.22% | 32.61% | -7.13% | 5.67% | -17.43% | 6.73% | 61.52% | 33.48% | -19.26% | 29.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUAX achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly higher than CAEIX's 4.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUAX has underperformed CAEIX with an annualized return of 7.48%, while CAEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.93% annualized return.
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
CAEIX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -7.32%
- YTD
- 4.22%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 41.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSUAX vs. CAEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than CAEIX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSUAX vs. CAEIX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUAX
CAEIX
CSUAX vs. CAEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSUAX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 2.20 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 2.90 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 3.39 | -1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 14.41 | -4.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSUAX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 2.20 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.18 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.03 | +0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUAX and CAEIX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSUAX vs. CAEIX - Dividend Comparison
CSUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than CAEIX's 0.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund | 0.69% | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.07% | 0.86% | 0.49% | 0.82% | 1.23% | 2.00% | 1.40% | 1.79% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
CSUAX vs. CAEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUAX drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, smaller than the maximum CAEIX drawdown of -75.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAX and CAEIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUAX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.20% | -75.81% | +23.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.98% | -11.07% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.45% | -32.58% | +12.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.05% | -37.54% | +2.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -13.12% | +8.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.49% | -49.06% | +40.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 2.62% | -0.79% |
Volatility
CSUAX vs. CAEIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) is 3.26%, while Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) has a volatility of 6.88%. This indicates that CSUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSUAX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 6.88% | -3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.89% | 12.14% | -5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.48% | 18.28% | -6.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 19.08% | -6.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 19.61% | -4.72% |