CSTA.DE vs. WQTM.DE
CSTA.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist) and WQTM.DE (WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds - CSTA.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Technology while WQTM.DE tracks the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSTA.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WQTM.DE.
Performance
CSTA.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSTA.DE achieves a 26.81% return, which is significantly lower than WQTM.DE's 50.87% return.
CSTA.DE
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 13.62%
- YTD
- 26.81%
- 6M
- 24.26%
- 1Y
- 24.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 8.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
WQTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 17.46%
- YTD
- 50.87%
- 6M
- 44.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSTA.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSTA.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist | 26.81% | 8.98% |
WQTM.DE WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 50.87% | 22.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSTA.DE and WQTM.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSTA.DE vs. WQTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSTA.DE
WQTM.DE
CSTA.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WQTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSTA.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSTA.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 3.21 | -2.68 |
Drawdowns
CSTA.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSTA.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.24%, which is greater than WQTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTA.DE and WQTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSTA.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.24% | -24.12% | -16.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.88% | +3.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.76% | -10.07% | +1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | — | — |
Volatility
CSTA.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSTA.DE | WQTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.89% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.18% | 39.69% | -16.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.97% | 39.69% | -14.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.33% | 39.69% | -16.36% |
CSTA.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSTA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than WQTM.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSTA.DE vs. WQTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSTA.DE nor WQTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSTA.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.59% | 1.04% | 0.52% | 0.55% | 1.26% | 1.49% | 0.09% |
WQTM.DE WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSTA.DE and WQTM.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSTA.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSTA.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WQTM.DE.
CSTA.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Technology, while WQTM.DE tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CSTA.DE and 0.50% for WQTM.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSTA.DE and WQTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer