CSTA.DE vs. LYMS.DE
CSTA.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist) and LYMS.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CSTA.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Technology, while LYMS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSTA.DE returned 13.18%/yr vs 21.41%/yr for LYMS.DE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSTA.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for LYMS.DE.
Performance
CSTA.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSTA.DE achieves a 26.81% return, which is significantly higher than LYMS.DE's 20.63% return. Over the past 10 years, CSTA.DE has underperformed LYMS.DE with an annualized return of 13.18%, while LYMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.41% annualized return.
CSTA.DE
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 15.91%
- YTD
- 26.81%
- 6M
- 24.52%
- 1Y
- 25.25%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 8.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
LYMS.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 19.42%
- 1Y
- 37.94%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 18.88%
- 10Y*
- 21.41%
CSTA.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSTA.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist | 26.81% | 3.46% | 6.60% | 32.50% | -27.79% | 34.31% | 14.21% | 37.95% | -10.18% | 20.74% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 20.63% | 7.15% | 33.72% | 51.52% | -29.87% | 39.59% | 34.60% | 42.84% | 3.18% | 15.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSTA.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2008 | 0.64 |
The correlation between CSTA.DE and LYMS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSTA.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSTA.DE
LYMS.DE
CSTA.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSTA.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.42 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 3.77 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.37 | 11.23 | -6.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSTA.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 2.40 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.94 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 1.08 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.77 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
CSTA.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSTA.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.24%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSTA.DE and LYMS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSTA.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.24% | -50.00% | +9.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.91% | -10.02% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.86% | -26.74% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.24% | -31.12% | -9.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.24% | -31.12% | -9.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.86% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.76% | -8.78% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | 3.37% | +2.40% |
Volatility
CSTA.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) at 4.37%. This indicates that CSTA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSTA.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.89% | 4.37% | +3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.06% | 10.99% | +8.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.18% | 15.73% | +7.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.97% | 19.91% | +5.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.33% | 19.68% | +3.65% |
CSTA.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSTA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSTA.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSTA.DE nor LYMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSTA.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.59% | 1.04% | 0.52% | 0.55% | 1.26% | 1.49% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSTA.DE and LYMS.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CSTA.DE.
CSTA.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while LYMS.DE is Nasdaq-100. CSTA.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Technology, while LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CSTA.DE and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSTA.DE and LYMS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer