PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSSX5E.MI vs. IWMO.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSSX5E.MI vs. IWMO.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSSX5E.MI) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWMO.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSSX5E.MI achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than IWMO.MI's 23.63% return. Over the past 10 years, CSSX5E.MI has underperformed IWMO.MI with an annualized return of 10.41%, while IWMO.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.44% annualized return.


CSSX5E.MI

1D
-0.78%
1M
6.04%
YTD
6.16%
6M
8.28%
1Y
15.57%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
10.41%

IWMO.MI

1D
1.31%
1M
12.04%
YTD
23.63%
6M
26.10%
1Y
32.95%
3Y*
26.49%
5Y*
14.89%
10Y*
15.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSSX5E.MI vs. IWMO.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSSX5E.MI
iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc
6.16%23.04%10.93%22.79%-9.22%23.62%-2.24%29.02%-11.96%9.95%
IWMO.MI
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
23.63%8.04%39.23%7.91%-13.96%24.82%17.08%31.14%0.40%16.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CSSX5E.MI and IWMO.MI is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2015

0.62

The correlation between CSSX5E.MI and IWMO.MI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSSX5E.MI vs. IWMO.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSSX5E.MI
CSSX5E.MI Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CSSX5E.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSSX5E.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSSX5E.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CSSX5E.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSSX5E.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

IWMO.MI
IWMO.MI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IWMO.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMO.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMO.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMO.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMO.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSSX5E.MI vs. IWMO.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSSX5E.MI) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWMO.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSSX5E.MIIWMO.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.36

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

3.65

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.84

13.93

-9.09

CSSX5E.MI vs. IWMO.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSSX5E.MI Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the IWMO.MI Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSSX5E.MI and IWMO.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSSX5E.MIIWMO.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

1.96

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.85

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.91

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.81

-0.40

Drawdowns

CSSX5E.MI vs. IWMO.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSSX5E.MI drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, which is greater than IWMO.MI's maximum drawdown of -31.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSX5E.MI and IWMO.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSSX5E.MIIWMO.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.50%

-31.03%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.81%

-9.04%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.36%

-23.45%

+7.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.56%

-23.45%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

-31.03%

-7.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

0.00%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-5.88%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

2.37%

+0.84%

Volatility

CSSX5E.MI vs. IWMO.MI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSSX5E.MI) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWMO.MI) have volatilities of 5.55% and 5.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSSX5E.MIIWMO.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

5.83%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.88%

14.14%

-1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

16.85%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.52%

17.28%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

17.60%

+0.72%

CSSX5E.MI vs. IWMO.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSSX5E.MI has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMO.MI's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSSX5E.MI vs. IWMO.MI - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSSX5E.MI nor IWMO.MI has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CSSX5E.MI and IWMO.MI have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSSX5E.MI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSSX5E.MI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IWMO.MI.

CSSX5E.MI is categorized as Europe Equities, while IWMO.MI is Momentum. CSSX5E.MI tracks EURO STOXX® 50, while IWMO.MI tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSSX5E.MI and 0.25% for IWMO.MI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSSX5E.MI and IWMO.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer