CSSPX.MI vs. ^GSPC
CSSPX.MI (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, CSSPX.MI returned 14.96%/yr vs 13.40%/yr for ^GSPC. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CSSPX.MI vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSSPX.MI is traded in EUR, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSSPX.MI achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 12.06% return. Over the past 10 years, CSSPX.MI has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 14.96%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.40% annualized return.
CSSPX.MI
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 11.35%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 25.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 14.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.96%
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 6M
- 10.90%
- 1Y
- 24.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
CSSPX.MI vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSPX.MI iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.35% | 4.27% | 33.76% | 22.03% | -14.58% | 40.89% | 7.57% | 34.27% | -1.05% | 6.71% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 12.06% | 2.58% | 31.45% | 20.51% | -14.45% | 36.38% | 6.68% | 31.79% | -1.84% | 4.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSPX.MI and ^GSPC is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2010 | 0.59 |
The correlation between CSSPX.MI and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSSPX.MI vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
CSSPX.MI
^GSPC
CSSPX.MI vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSSPX.MI) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSSPX.MI | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.37 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 3.30 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.78 | 12.34 | +0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSSPX.MI | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.04 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.80 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | 0.72 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.51 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
CSSPX.MI vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSPX.MI drawdown since its inception was -33.56%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSPX.MI and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSPX.MI | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.56% | -51.62% | +18.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -7.57% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.26% | -23.99% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.26% | -23.99% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -33.42% | -0.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.20% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -9.08% | +4.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 2.02% | -0.01% |
Volatility
CSSPX.MI vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSSPX.MI) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.24%. This indicates that CSSPX.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSSPX.MI | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 2.24% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.54% | 8.62% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.46% | 12.29% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 16.79% | -1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 18.59% | -2.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSSPX.MI and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CSSPX.MI and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer