CSSC.DE vs. VETH.DE
CSSC.DE (CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP) and VETH.DE (VanEck Ethereum ETN) are both Cryptocurrency funds. CSSC.DE is actively managed, while VETH.DE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CSSC.DE returned 6.55%/yr vs -4.01%/yr for VETH.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSSC.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for VETH.DE.
Performance
CSSC.DE vs. VETH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSSC.DE achieves a -31.24% return, which is significantly higher than VETH.DE's -39.67% return.
CSSC.DE
- 1D
- -4.53%
- 1M
- -15.26%
- YTD
- -31.24%
- 6M
- -38.90%
- 1Y
- -40.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VETH.DE
- 1D
- -3.74%
- 1M
- -24.94%
- YTD
- -39.67%
- 6M
- -44.14%
- 1Y
- -34.03%
- 3Y*
- -4.01%
- 5Y*
- -7.06%
- 10Y*
- —
CSSC.DE vs. VETH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSC.DE CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP | -31.24% | -35.55% | 50.17% | 86.11% |
VETH.DE VanEck Ethereum ETN | -39.67% | -21.95% | 52.69% | 33.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSC.DE and VETH.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between CSSC.DE and VETH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSSC.DE vs. VETH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSSC.DE
VETH.DE
CSSC.DE vs. VETH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE) and VanEck Ethereum ETN (VETH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSSC.DE | VETH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.94 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | -0.55 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | -0.93 | -0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSSC.DE | VETH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.74 | -0.57 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | -0.02 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
CSSC.DE vs. VETH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSC.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, smaller than the maximum VETH.DE drawdown of -76.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSC.DE and VETH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSC.DE | VETH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.21% | -76.77% | +11.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.70% | -61.72% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.21% | -64.62% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -76.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.95% | -64.08% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.09% | -43.71% | +15.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.93% | 36.40% | +2.53% |
Volatility
CSSC.DE vs. VETH.DE - Volatility Comparison
CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE) and VanEck Ethereum ETN (VETH.DE) have volatilities of 10.56% and 10.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSSC.DE | VETH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.56% | 10.16% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.99% | 42.41% | -5.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.25% | 59.68% | -5.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.64% | 68.20% | -8.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.64% | 71.44% | -11.80% |
CSSC.DE vs. VETH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSSC.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VETH.DE's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSSC.DE vs. VETH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSSC.DE nor VETH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, CSSC.DE and VETH.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CSSC.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSC.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for VETH.DE.
They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CSSC.DE and 1.00% for VETH.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSSC.DE and VETH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer