PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSRIX vs. CSUIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSRIX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares (CSRIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSRIX achieves a 17.94% return, which is significantly higher than CSUIX's 12.65% return. Over the past 10 years, CSRIX has underperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 6.79%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.58% annualized return.


CSRIX

1D
-1.33%
1M
2.02%
6M
15.55%
YTD
17.94%
1Y
17.69%
3Y*
10.62%
5Y*
4.13%
10Y*
6.79%
ALL TIME*
7.47%

CSUIX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.08%
6M
8.19%
YTD
12.65%
1Y
18.03%
3Y*
12.05%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
7.58%
ALL TIME*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CSRIX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSRIX
Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares
17.94%3.10%6.26%12.75%-25.15%42.40%-2.55%36.11%-4.68%6.71%
CSUIX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.
12.65%14.69%8.74%2.46%-4.89%16.60%-1.29%24.72%-5.52%18.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CSRIX and CSUIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.72

The correlation between CSRIX and CSUIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSRIX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSRIX
CSRIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CSRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CSRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

CSUIX
CSUIX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CSUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSRIX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares (CSRIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSRIXCSUIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.33

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

3.15

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

10.01

-3.48

CSRIX vs. CSUIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the CSUIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSRIX and CSUIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSRIX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSRIX drawdown since its inception was -41.45%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSRIX and CSUIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSRIXCSUIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.45%

-52.01%

+10.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-5.96%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.89%

-11.74%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.79%

-20.01%

-11.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.45%

-35.01%

-6.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-1.68%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.69%

-8.11%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

1.87%

+0.76%

Volatility

CSRIX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares (CSRIX) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.03%. This indicates that CSRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSRIXCSUIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

3.03%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

8.16%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.36%

10.13%

+4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.69%

12.98%

+5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

14.87%

+5.68%

CSRIX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSRIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSRIX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison

CSRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than CSUIX's 7.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSRIX
Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares
2.66%3.14%2.97%3.04%4.28%3.87%4.91%12.97%5.45%6.28%12.61%13.63%
CSUIX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.
7.91%8.41%2.58%2.53%3.91%3.25%1.64%1.83%2.45%5.12%2.35%6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSRIX and CSUIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSRIX has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to CSUIX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSRIX dropped -41.45% vs CSUIX's -52.01%.

CSUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSRIX and CSUIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer