CSQAX vs. TMSRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX).
CSQAX is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse Liquid Alternative Beta Index. It was launched on Mar 30, 2012. TMSRX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Feb 22, 2018.
Performance
CSQAX vs. TMSRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSQAX vs. TMSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSQAX Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares | 0.95% | 0.73% | 0.66% | 1.72% | 5.52% | 9.98% | 6.10% | 2.88% | -5.06% |
TMSRX T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund | 0.41% | 2.95% | 5.36% | 5.09% | -4.69% | -2.08% | 13.21% | 7.59% | -4.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSQAX achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly higher than TMSRX's 0.41% return.
CSQAX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- -1.45%
- 3Y*
- 2.50%
- 5Y*
- 2.91%
- 10Y*
- 3.09%
TMSRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- 2.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSQAX vs. TMSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSQAX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than TMSRX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSQAX vs. TMSRX — Risk / Return Rank
CSQAX
TMSRX
CSQAX vs. TMSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSQAX | TMSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | 1.41 | -1.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | 1.85 | -1.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.36 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 1.50 | -1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 5.92 | -6.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSQAX | TMSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 1.41 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.42 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.84 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSQAX and TMSRX is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CSQAX vs. TMSRX - Dividend Comparison
CSQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than TMSRX's 9.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSQAX Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares | 1.08% | 1.09% | 6.54% | 2.73% | 2.59% | 9.06% | 13.23% | 4.77% | 1.84% | 5.27% | 1.87% | 0.24% |
TMSRX T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund | 9.49% | 7.59% | 6.72% | 5.95% | 2.29% | 2.88% | 3.35% | 3.00% | 3.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CSQAX vs. TMSRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSQAX drawdown since its inception was -8.37%, smaller than the maximum TMSRX drawdown of -10.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSQAX and TMSRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSQAX | TMSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -10.67% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.05% | -1.84% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.28% | -10.59% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.69% | -0.16% | -4.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -2.79% | +0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 0.50% | +2.66% |
Volatility
CSQAX vs. TMSRX - Volatility Comparison
Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) at 0.00%. This indicates that CSQAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSQAX | TMSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 0.00% | +3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.78% | 1.44% | +4.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.60% | 2.10% | +5.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.33% | 2.79% | +3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.98% | 3.31% | +2.67% |