PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSQAX vs. CRSOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSQAX vs. CRSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX) and Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSQAX achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than CRSOX's 27.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CSQAX has underperformed CRSOX with an annualized return of 3.38%, while CRSOX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.38% annualized return.


CSQAX

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
4.14%
6M
3.50%
1Y
3.44%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
3.38%

CRSOX

1D
0.39%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
27.02%
6M
26.55%
1Y
39.05%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
7.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSQAX vs. CRSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSQAX
Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares
4.14%0.73%0.66%1.72%5.52%9.98%6.10%2.88%-4.31%4.07%
CRSOX
Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund
27.02%15.66%5.21%-8.88%16.40%28.99%-1.12%6.99%-11.65%1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CSQAX and CRSOX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2012

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSQAX vs. CRSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSQAX
CSQAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CSQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CSQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

CRSOX
CRSOX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CRSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSQAX vs. CRSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX) and Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSQAXCRSOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

2.44

-1.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.70

3.05

-2.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.43

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

5.29

-4.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.75

14.39

-12.64

CSQAX vs. CRSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSQAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the CRSOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSQAX and CRSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSQAXCRSOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

2.44

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.76

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.52

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.08

+0.44

Drawdowns

CSQAX vs. CRSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSQAX drawdown since its inception was -8.37%, smaller than the maximum CRSOX drawdown of -74.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSQAX and CRSOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSQAXCRSOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.37%

-74.26%

+65.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.92%

-7.49%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.27%

-11.43%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.28%

-25.50%

+18.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.37%

-31.89%

+23.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-28.44%

+26.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-45.15%

+43.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.74%

-0.78%

Volatility

CSQAX vs. CRSOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX) is 1.90%, while Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that CSQAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSQAXCRSOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.90%

5.30%

-3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.61%

14.12%

-8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.24%

16.32%

-9.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.32%

16.07%

-9.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.03%

14.33%

-8.30%

CSQAX vs. CRSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSQAX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CRSOX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSQAX vs. CRSOX - Dividend Comparison

CSQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than CRSOX's 6.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRSOX
Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund
6.30%4.78%3.39%3.38%16.50%39.76%0.14%1.20%1.12%2.75%0.00%0.00%
CSQAX
Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares
1.04%1.09%6.54%2.73%2.59%9.06%13.23%4.77%1.84%5.27%1.87%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSQAX and CRSOX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRSOX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to CSQAX (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSQAX dropped -8.37% vs CRSOX's -74.26%.

CRSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSQAX and CRSOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer