CSQ vs. CNWIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX).
CSQ is an actively managed fund by Calamos. It was launched on Mar 26, 2004. CNWIX is managed by Calamos.
Performance
CSQ vs. CNWIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSQ vs. CNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund | -9.64% | 16.25% | 28.11% | 20.80% | -24.26% | 30.77% | 26.22% | 38.62% | -4.89% | 27.98% |
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 4.79% | 19.29% | 14.99% | 6.60% | -24.35% | -4.70% | 54.23% | 20.76% | -17.74% | 36.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSQ achieves a -9.64% return, which is significantly lower than CNWIX's 4.79% return. Over the past 10 years, CSQ has outperformed CNWIX with an annualized return of 14.80%, while CNWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.36% annualized return.
CSQ
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- -9.32%
- YTD
- -9.64%
- 6M
- -8.01%
- 1Y
- 13.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.80%
CNWIX
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -16.05%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 6M
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.45%
- 5Y*
- 2.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSQ vs. CNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSQ has a 2.46% expense ratio, which is higher than CNWIX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSQ vs. CNWIX — Risk / Return Rank
CSQ
CNWIX
CSQ vs. CNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSQ | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 1.36 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 1.78 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.26 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 1.55 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.29 | 6.05 | -2.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSQ | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.36 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.12 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.35 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.27 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSQ and CNWIX is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CSQ vs. CNWIX - Dividend Comparison
CSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than CNWIX's 0.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund | 7.54% | 6.51% | 6.95% | 8.27% | 9.17% | 6.38% | 7.03% | 7.14% | 9.35% | 8.20% | 9.64% | 10.00% |
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.97% | 2.79% | 2.01% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.38% |
Drawdowns
CSQ vs. CNWIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSQ drawdown since its inception was -67.17%, which is greater than CNWIX's maximum drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSQ and CNWIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSQ | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.17% | -43.57% | -23.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.59% | -16.28% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.09% | -37.47% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.21% | -43.57% | -4.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.07% | -16.28% | +4.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -16.56% | +7.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 4.17% | -0.23% |
Volatility
CSQ vs. CNWIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ) is 6.85%, while Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) has a volatility of 10.65%. This indicates that CSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSQ | CNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 10.65% | -3.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.54% | 16.88% | -5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.12% | 20.17% | +0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 17.53% | +2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 24.07% | -1.14% |