CSPX.L vs. VHYD.L
CSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and VHYD.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - CSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while VHYD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSPX.L returned 14.88%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for VHYD.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSPX.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for VHYD.L.
Performance
CSPX.L vs. VHYD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSPX.L achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly lower than VHYD.L's 10.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CSPX.L has outperformed VHYD.L with an annualized return of 14.88%, while VHYD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.04% annualized return.
CSPX.L
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 6.25%
- 6M
- 6.74%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.45%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.88%
VHYD.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 24.59%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
CSPX.L vs. VHYD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.25% | 17.45% | 25.25% | 26.74% | -18.72% | 29.35% | 17.62% | 30.55% | -5.46% | 21.60% |
VHYD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 10.10% | 27.03% | 9.32% | 11.43% | -5.45% | 17.84% | -0.31% | 20.75% | -11.71% | 19.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSPX.L and VHYD.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2013 | 0.82 |
The correlation between CSPX.L and VHYD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (3 years) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CSPX.L vs. VHYD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSPX.L
VHYD.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
CSPX.L
VHYD.L
Financial Services
CSPX.L
VHYD.L
Communication Services
CSPX.L
VHYD.L
Consumer Cyclical
CSPX.L
VHYD.L
Healthcare
CSPX.L
VHYD.L
Industrials
CSPX.L
VHYD.L
Consumer Defensive
CSPX.L
VHYD.L
Energy
CSPX.L
VHYD.L
Utilities
CSPX.L
VHYD.L
Real Estate
CSPX.L
VHYD.L
Basic Materials
CSPX.L
VHYD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSPX.L vs. VHYD.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSPX.L
VHYD.L
CSPX.L vs. VHYD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSPX.L | VHYD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.42 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.16 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.05 | 11.39 | -0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSPX.L vs. VHYD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, smaller than the maximum VHYD.L drawdown of -36.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPX.L and VHYD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSPX.L | VHYD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -36.60% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -7.74% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -12.48% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.39% | -20.89% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -36.60% | +2.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.20% | -1.09% | -3.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -5.31% | +1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 2.15% | -0.19% |
Volatility
CSPX.L vs. VHYD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) at 2.58%. This indicates that CSPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSPX.L | VHYD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 2.58% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 8.52% | +0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.90% | 10.63% | +1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 13.65% | +2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 15.38% | +0.83% |
CSPX.L vs. VHYD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSPX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VHYD.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSPX.L vs. VHYD.L - Dividend Comparison
CSPX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VHYD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VHYD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 2.51% | 2.77% | 3.15% | 3.31% | 3.72% | 3.14% | 2.90% | 3.23% | 3.77% | 2.96% | 3.16% | 3.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSPX.L and VHYD.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSPX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYD.L.
CSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VHYD.L is Global Equities. CSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while VHYD.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSPX.L and 0.29% for VHYD.L.
Find the right allocation for CSPX.L and VHYD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer