PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSPX.L vs. MKL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSPX.L vs. MKL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) and Markel Corporation (MKL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSPX.L achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly higher than MKL's -14.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CSPX.L has outperformed MKL with an annualized return of 15.24%, while MKL has yielded a comparatively lower 7.12% annualized return.


CSPX.L

1D
2.02%
1M
0.42%
YTD
8.40%
6M
9.68%
1Y
24.50%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
15.24%

MKL

1D
0.87%
1M
1.40%
YTD
-14.13%
6M
-14.86%
1Y
-5.08%
3Y*
11.11%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
7.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSPX.L vs. MKL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSPX.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
8.40%17.45%25.25%26.74%-18.72%29.35%17.62%30.55%-5.46%21.60%
MKL
Markel Corporation
-14.13%24.53%21.57%7.77%6.77%19.42%-9.61%10.13%-8.87%25.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CSPX.L and MKL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010

0.29

The correlation between CSPX.L and MKL shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (3 years) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSPX.L vs. MKL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSPX.L
CSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

MKL
MKL Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MKL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKL Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MKL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKL Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSPX.L vs. MKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) and Markel Corporation (MKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSPX.LMKLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.97

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

-0.25

+3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

-0.60

+13.05

CSPX.L vs. MKL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the MKL Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSPX.L and MKL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSPX.L vs. MKL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, smaller than the maximum MKL drawdown of -61.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPX.L and MKL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSPX.LMKLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-61.32%

+27.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-20.10%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-20.10%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.39%

-28.87%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-44.66%

+10.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-15.78%

+13.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-11.39%

+7.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

8.47%

-6.51%

Volatility

CSPX.L vs. MKL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) is 4.01%, while Markel Corporation (MKL) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that CSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MKL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSPX.LMKLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

4.33%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

13.32%

-4.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

18.87%

-6.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

22.43%

-6.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

25.27%

-9.05%

Dividends

CSPX.L vs. MKL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSPX.L nor MKL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CSPX.L and MKL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSPX.L and MKL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer