PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CSP1.L vs. VMIG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CSP1.L vs. VMIG.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and VMIG.L (Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while VMIG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSP1.L returned 14.38%/yr vs 6.27%/yr for VMIG.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSP1.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VMIG.L.

Performance

CSP1.L vs. VMIG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSP1.L is traded in GBp, while VMIG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VMIG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSP1.L achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly higher than VMIG.L's 5.33% return.

CSP1.L

1D
1.46%
1M
1.17%
YTD
8.73%
6M
9.12%
1Y
26.08%
3Y*
18.26%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*
15.83%

VMIG.L

1D
1.60%
1M
3.93%
YTD
5.33%
6M
8.43%
1Y
12.81%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSP1.L vs. VMIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF		8.73%9.37%27.35%19.79%-9.05%31.07%13.65%13.62%
VMIG.L
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating		5.33%13.52%11.01%11.96%-14.58%19.28%-2.22%17.54%

Correlation

The correlation between CSP1.L and VMIG.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019

0.55

The correlation between CSP1.L and VMIG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSP1.L vs. VMIG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CSP1.L
VMIG.L

Technology

38.4%
9.4%

Financial Services

11.0%
19.4%

Communication Services

10.8%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
13.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
4.4%

Industrials

7.9%
19.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
6.1%

Energy

3.2%
2.5%

Utilities

2.1%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
9.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
6.6%

Technology

CSP1.L
38.4%
VMIG.L
9.4%

Financial Services

CSP1.L
11.0%
VMIG.L
19.4%

Communication Services

CSP1.L
10.8%
VMIG.L
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CSP1.L
10.0%
VMIG.L
13.3%

Healthcare

CSP1.L
8.4%
VMIG.L
4.4%

Industrials

CSP1.L
7.9%
VMIG.L
19.9%

Consumer Defensive

CSP1.L
4.6%
VMIG.L
6.1%

Energy

CSP1.L
3.2%
VMIG.L
2.5%

Utilities

CSP1.L
2.1%
VMIG.L
3.0%

Real Estate

CSP1.L
1.8%
VMIG.L
9.4%

Basic Materials

CSP1.L
1.7%
VMIG.L
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF

Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating

Often compared with CSP1.L:
CSP1.L vs. CSPX.LCSP1.L vs. VUAG.LCSP1.L vs. SPYCSP1.L vs. IUSA.LCSP1.L vs. VUAA.LCSP1.L vs. SPY5.LCSP1.L vs. VOO
Often compared with VMIG.L:
VMIG.L vs. VUKG.LVMIG.L vs. VMID.LVMIG.L vs. VWRP.LVMIG.L vs. MIDVMIG.L vs. CUKS.LVMIG.L vs. VUAG.LVMIG.L vs. FTAD.L

Return for Risk

CSP1.L vs. VMIG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
VMIG.L
VMIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
VMIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSP1.L vs. VMIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CSP1.LVMIG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.39
1.03

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.22
1.56

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.19

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

1.10

+2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.18

3.96

+9.22

CSP1.L vs. VMIG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the VMIG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSP1.L and VMIG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSP1.L vs. VMIG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSP1.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, smaller than the maximum VMIG.L drawdown of -41.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSP1.L and VMIG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CSP1.LVMIG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.48%

-41.38%

+15.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-11.59%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-14.60%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.77%

-27.02%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.48%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-0.54%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-7.76%

+4.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

3.23%

-1.26%

Volatility

CSP1.L vs. VMIG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) have volatilities of 3.54% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CSP1.LVMIG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

3.69%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.53%

10.30%

-2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.91%

12.44%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.02%

15.07%

+4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

17.37%

+1.08%

CSP1.L vs. VMIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSP1.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VMIG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CSP1.L vs. VMIG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSP1.L nor VMIG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VMIG.L
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating		0.00%0.51%3.22%3.33%3.21%2.55%2.05%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

CSP1.L and VMIG.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VMIG.L.

CSP1.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VMIG.L is Europe Equities. CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while VMIG.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSP1.L and 0.10% for VMIG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSP1.L and VMIG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer