CSNR vs. PICK
CSNR (Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF) and PICK (iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while PICK is a Metals fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. CSNR is actively managed, while PICK is passively managed. Over the past year, CSNR returned 31.06% vs 69.31% for PICK. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSNR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PICK.
Performance
CSNR vs. PICK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSNR achieves a 11.05% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 17.36% return.
CSNR
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -7.34%
- YTD
- 11.05%
- 6M
- 10.21%
- 1Y
- 31.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PICK
- 1D
- -4.38%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- YTD
- 17.36%
- 6M
- 17.02%
- 1Y
- 69.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 16.67%
CSNR vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | 11.05% | 26.83% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 17.36% | 47.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSNR and PICK is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025 | 0.71 |
The correlation between CSNR and PICK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSNR vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank
CSNR
PICK
CSNR vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSNR | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.39 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 3.56 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.10 | 13.38 | -1.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSNR vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSNR drawdown since its inception was -15.33%, smaller than the maximum PICK drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSNR and PICK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSNR | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -68.87% | +53.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.18% | -19.54% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.18% | -12.59% | +2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.97% | -24.06% | +22.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 5.20% | -2.63% |
Volatility
CSNR vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) is 6.08%, while iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a volatility of 13.12%. This indicates that CSNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSNR | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 13.12% | -7.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.51% | 26.56% | -12.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 30.14% | -12.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.02% | 28.14% | -8.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.02% | 28.34% | -8.32% |
CSNR vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSNR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSNR vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison
CSNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than PICK's 2.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | 2.17% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.21% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSNR and PICK have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PICK has higher volatility (13.12%) compared to CSNR (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSNR dropped -15.33% vs PICK's -68.87%.
On 1-year performance, PICK leads with 69.31% vs 31.06% for CSNR. On fees, PICK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, CSNR has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PICK has performed better with a 69.31% return vs 31.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PICK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CSNR.
PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 2.17% for CSNR.
CSNR is categorized as Natural Resources, while PICK is Metals. They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CSNR and 0.39% for PICK.
PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSNR and PICK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer