CSNR vs. CSIO
CSNR (Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF) and CSIO (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSNR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while CSIO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSNR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CSIO.
Performance
CSNR vs. CSIO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSNR achieves a 21.88% return, which is significantly higher than CSIO's 13.87% return.
CSNR
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 21.88%
- 6M
- 24.62%
- 1Y
- 47.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSIO
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 13.87%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSNR vs. CSIO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | 21.88% | 2.23% |
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 13.87% | -0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSNR and CSIO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSNR vs. CSIO — Risk / Return Rank
CSNR
CSIO
CSNR vs. CSIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSNR | CSIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSNR | CSIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.97 | 2.73 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
CSNR vs. CSIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSNR drawdown since its inception was -15.33%, which is greater than CSIO's maximum drawdown of -5.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSNR and CSIO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSNR | CSIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -5.86% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -2.10% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -1.12% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | — | — |
Volatility
CSNR vs. CSIO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSNR | CSIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 11.54% | +5.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 11.54% | +8.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 11.54% | +8.23% |
CSNR vs. CSIO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSNR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CSIO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSNR vs. CSIO - Dividend Comparison
CSNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than CSIO's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 0.66% | 0.00% |
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | 1.98% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSNR and CSIO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSNR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSNR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSIO.
CSNR has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.66% for CSIO.
CSNR is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while CSIO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CSNR and 0.65% for CSIO.
Find the right allocation for CSNR and CSIO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer