PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSMIX vs. SHGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSMIX vs. SHGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSMIX achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly lower than SHGTX's 58.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CSMIX has underperformed SHGTX with an annualized return of 11.74%, while SHGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.87% annualized return.


CSMIX

1D
0.51%
1M
4.30%
YTD
14.05%
6M
14.39%
1Y
37.53%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
11.74%

SHGTX

1D
3.58%
1M
16.12%
YTD
58.37%
6M
55.67%
1Y
121.45%
3Y*
46.55%
5Y*
26.25%
10Y*
27.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSMIX vs. SHGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSMIX
Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I
14.05%14.65%8.66%21.42%-8.87%28.95%7.82%21.01%-18.37%13.77%
SHGTX
Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund
58.37%35.09%26.04%45.28%-31.70%38.60%45.56%54.92%-8.70%34.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CSMIX and SHGTX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 1994

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between CSMIX and SHGTX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSMIX vs. SHGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSMIX
CSMIX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CSMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SHGTX
SHGTX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SHGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SHGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSMIX vs. SHGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSMIXSHGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.69

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

10.16

-6.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.95

38.70

-26.75

CSMIX vs. SHGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is lower than the SHGTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSMIX and SHGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSMIXSHGTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

4.85

-2.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.96

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

1.04

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.66

-0.17

Drawdowns

CSMIX vs. SHGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSMIX drawdown since its inception was -53.37%, smaller than the maximum SHGTX drawdown of -77.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMIX and SHGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSMIXSHGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.37%

-77.47%

+24.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.94%

-12.45%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.98%

-28.90%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.98%

-43.17%

+17.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.42%

-43.17%

-5.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.92%

-24.94%

+16.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

3.26%

+0.12%

Volatility

CSMIX vs. SHGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX) is 4.59%, while Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that CSMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSMIXSHGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

7.24%

-2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

20.14%

-8.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.05%

26.07%

-8.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.49%

27.43%

-5.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.93%

26.79%

-2.86%

CSMIX vs. SHGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSMIX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than SHGTX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSMIX vs. SHGTX - Dividend Comparison

CSMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.47%, more than SHGTX's 5.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSMIX
Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I
12.47%14.23%6.67%7.57%6.02%13.34%0.50%3.58%9.79%11.56%11.58%12.73%
SHGTX
Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund
5.33%8.45%14.04%6.22%3.94%11.77%9.92%10.26%12.75%7.25%8.13%8.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSMIX and SHGTX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHGTX has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to CSMIX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSMIX dropped -53.37% vs SHGTX's -77.47%.

SHGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.85 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSMIX and SHGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer