CSMD vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CSMD (Congress SMID Growth ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. CSMD is actively managed, while QQQN is passively managed. CSMD charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

CSMD vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CSMD

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -5.76%
• 6M: 0.90%
• YTD: 6.61%
• 1Y: 6.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.82%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CSMD Congress SMID Growth ETF	$1.22M	$1.16M	$1.45M
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CSMD vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CSMD Congress SMID Growth ETF	3.12%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

CSMD vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CSMD	QQQN
Industrials	23.6%	8.7%
Technology	22.1%	47.3%
Healthcare	20.7%	19.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	13.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	1.4%
Financial Services	6.9%	-
Basic Materials	5.9%	1.9%
Energy	3.6%	-
Real Estate	1.7%	-
Communication Services	-	5.5%
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

CSMD vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSMD

CSMD Risk / Return Rank: 17
CSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
CSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
CSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 16
CSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
CSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 18

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSMD vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSMD	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.51	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.35	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.01	—	—

Drawdowns

CSMD vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSMD drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMD and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSMD	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.54%	0.00%	-22.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.62%	0.00%	-7.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	0.00%	-4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CSMD	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.58%	0.00%	+20.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.97%	0.00%	+19.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.97%	0.00%	+19.97%

CSMD vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSMD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSMD vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSMD nor QQQN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CSMD Congress SMID Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	0.02%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CSMD or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSMD or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CSMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSMD or QQQN?

CSMD and QQQN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CSMD and QQQN?

They also come from different issuers: Congress and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CSMD and 0.18% for QQQN.