CSMD vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CSMD (Congress SMID Growth ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSMD is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Congress, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. CSMD is actively managed, while IWM is passively managed. Over the past year, CSMD returned 15.98% vs 39.10% for IWM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSMD charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

CSMD vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSMD achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 17.07% return.

CSMD

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 6.99%
• YTD: 10.40%
• 6M: 9.33%
• 1Y: 15.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWM

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 17.07%
• 6M: 15.83%
• 1Y: 39.10%
• 3Y*: 17.88%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSMD vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CSMD Congress SMID Growth ETF	10.40%	5.68%	12.70%	6.44%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	17.07%	12.66%	11.38%	10.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CSMD and IWM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023	0.88

The correlation between CSMD and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSMD vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CSMD	IWM
Industrials	31.1%	17.1%
Technology	25.3%	19.5%
Healthcare	14.6%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	2.1%
Financial Services	3.7%	15.8%
Energy	3.6%	6.0%
Basic Materials	2.0%	4.5%
Real Estate	1.6%	5.7%
Communication Services	-	2.0%
Utilities	-	3.0%

Return for Risk

CSMD vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSMD

CSMD Risk / Return Rank: 24
CSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
CSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 25

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 62
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSMD vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSMD	IWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	2.05	-1.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	2.85	-1.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.34	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	3.56	-2.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.29	12.64	-9.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSMD vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSMD and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSMD	IWM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	2.05	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.37	+0.29

Drawdowns

CSMD vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSMD drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMD and IWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSMD	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.54%	-59.05%	+36.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.79%	-11.03%	-3.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.49%	+1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.76%	-10.77%	+6.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.85%	3.10%	+1.75%

Volatility

CSMD vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 5.75%. This indicates that CSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSMD	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.06%	5.75%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.57%	13.53%	+1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.97%	19.20%	-0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.79%	22.52%	-2.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.79%	23.04%	-3.25%

CSMD vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSMD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSMD vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

CSMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSMD Congress SMID Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.88%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSMD and IWM in my portfolio?

CSMD and IWM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSMD or IWM?

CSMD has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to IWM (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSMD dropped -22.54% vs IWM's -59.05%.

Which ETF is better, CSMD or IWM?

On 1-year performance, IWM leads with 39.10% vs 15.98% for CSMD. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSMD or IWM?

Over the 1-year period, IWM has performed better with a 39.10% return vs 15.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSMD or IWM?

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CSMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSMD or IWM?

IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for CSMD.

What is the main difference between CSMD and IWM?

CSMD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Congress and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CSMD and 0.19% for IWM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.