CSMCX vs. FGROX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CSMCX (Congress Small Cap Growth Fund) and FGROX (Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CSMCX returned 16.43%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for FGROX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSMCX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FGROX.

Performance

CSMCX vs. FGROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSMCX achieves a 13.90% return, which is significantly lower than FGROX's 26.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSMCX having a 16.43% annualized return and FGROX not far behind at 15.70%.

CSMCX

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 6.89%
• YTD: 13.90%
• 6M: 10.94%
• 1Y: 24.51%
• 3Y*: 15.65%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: 16.43%

FGROX

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: 7.35%
• YTD: 26.22%
• 6M: 24.64%
• 1Y: 68.45%
• 3Y*: 29.82%
• 5Y*: 12.60%
• 10Y*: 15.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSMCX vs. FGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CSMCX Congress Small Cap Growth Fund	13.90%	8.37%	18.65%	20.27%	-26.21%	39.30%	39.11%	36.12%	2.51%	22.58%
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	26.22%	31.85%	20.04%	19.04%	-24.42%	3.91%	38.92%	28.71%	-11.85%	28.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CSMCX and FGROX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2008	0.92

The correlation between CSMCX and FGROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CSMCX vs. FGROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSMCX

CSMCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
CSMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CSMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
CSMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
CSMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CSMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

FGROX

FGROX Risk / Return Rank: 83
FGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSMCX vs. FGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSMCX	FGROX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	2.90	-1.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	3.57	-1.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.45	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	5.11	-3.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.22	21.59	-15.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSMCX vs. FGROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the FGROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSMCX and FGROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSMCX	FGROX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	2.90	-1.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.50	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.63	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.52	+0.07

Drawdowns

CSMCX vs. FGROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSMCX drawdown since its inception was -56.20%, which is greater than FGROX's maximum drawdown of -41.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMCX and FGROX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSMCX	FGROX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.20%	-41.48%	-14.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.63%	-14.36%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.10%	-28.61%	+2.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.44%	-38.52%	+5.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.44%	-41.48%	+8.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.40%	-10.25%	+0.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.22%	3.38%	+0.84%

Volatility

CSMCX vs. FGROX - Volatility Comparison

Congress Small Cap Growth Fund (CSMCX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) have volatilities of 7.73% and 7.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSMCX	FGROX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.73%	7.62%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.88%	19.27%	-3.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.20%	25.34%	-4.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.60%	25.58%	-2.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.46%	25.18%	-2.72%

CSMCX vs. FGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSMCX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FGROX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSMCX vs. FGROX - Dividend Comparison

CSMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than FGROX's 9.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSMCX Congress Small Cap Growth Fund	2.05%	2.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	15.57%	7.05%	16.14%	10.04%	11.48%	0.00%	27.40%
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	9.02%	11.39%	13.92%	5.91%	8.13%	17.87%	8.04%	1.38%	11.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSMCX and FGROX in my portfolio?

CSMCX and FGROX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSMCX or FGROX?

CSMCX has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to FGROX (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSMCX dropped -56.20% vs FGROX's -41.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.