PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSM vs. SSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSM vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSM achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 21.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CSM has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 14.46%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 24.38% annualized return.


CSM

1D
-0.34%
1M
5.19%
YTD
9.53%
6M
11.44%
1Y
30.50%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
13.79%
10Y*
14.46%

SSO

1D
0.27%
1M
10.52%
YTD
21.07%
6M
21.28%
1Y
56.67%
3Y*
38.21%
5Y*
20.39%
10Y*
24.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSM vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSM
Proshares Large Cap Core Plus
9.53%21.84%22.09%23.50%-18.27%33.13%10.94%29.26%-7.88%22.52%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
21.07%26.19%43.48%46.65%-38.98%60.57%21.54%63.45%-14.60%44.35%

Correlation

The correlation between CSM and SSO is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2009

0.96

The correlation between CSM and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSM vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSM
SSO

Technology

28.7%
35.6%

Financial Services

16.3%
11.8%

Industrials

9.0%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.5%

Communication Services

7.7%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Utilities

3.8%
2.4%

Real Estate

3.1%
1.9%

Energy

3.1%
3.5%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.8%

Technology

CSM
28.7%
SSO
35.6%

Financial Services

CSM
16.3%
SSO
11.8%

Industrials

CSM
9.0%
SSO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CSM
8.7%
SSO
10.1%

Healthcare

CSM
8.5%
SSO
8.5%

Communication Services

CSM
7.7%
SSO
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

CSM
4.9%
SSO
4.9%

Utilities

CSM
3.8%
SSO
2.4%

Real Estate

CSM
3.1%
SSO
1.9%

Energy

CSM
3.1%
SSO
3.5%

Basic Materials

CSM
1.9%
SSO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSM vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSM
CSM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSM vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSMSSODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

2.42

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

3.03

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.40

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.21

+0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.22

14.14

+0.08

CSM vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSM and SSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSMSSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.42

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.61

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.68

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.42

+0.44

Drawdowns

CSM vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSM drawdown since its inception was -36.11%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSM and SSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSMSSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.11%

-84.67%

+48.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.40%

-18.17%

+8.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.30%

-35.21%

+16.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.82%

-46.73%

+22.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.11%

-59.34%

+23.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

0.00%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-19.57%

+15.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

4.13%

-1.98%

Volatility

CSM vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) is 2.74%, while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that CSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSMSSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

5.46%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.78%

17.74%

-8.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

23.57%

-11.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

33.65%

-16.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

35.90%

-17.52%

CSM vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSM vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

CSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than SSO's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSM
Proshares Large Cap Core Plus
1.00%1.04%1.06%1.17%1.37%0.78%1.21%1.41%1.54%1.28%1.49%1.67%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.61%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, CSM and SSO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SSO has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to CSM (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSM dropped -36.11% vs SSO's -84.67%.

On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.38% vs 14.46% for CSM. On fees, CSM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CSM has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.38% return vs 14.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.

CSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.61% for SSO.

CSM is categorized as Long-Short, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. CSM tracks Credit Suisse 130/30 Large-Cap Index, while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CSM and 0.87% for SSO.

CSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSM and SSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer