CSM vs. IQQQ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CSM (Proshares Large Cap Core Plus) and IQQQ (ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSM is a Long-Short fund tracking the Credit Suisse 130/30 Large-Cap Index, while IQQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CSM returned 22.48% vs 25.95% for IQQQ. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for IQQQ.

Performance

CSM vs. IQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSM achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than IQQQ's 13.67% return.

CSM

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 1.32%
• 6M: 7.25%
• YTD: 8.50%
• 1Y: 22.48%
• 3Y*: 19.76%
• 5Y*: 12.63%
• 10Y*: 13.96%

IQQQ

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: -1.65%
• 6M: 11.37%
• YTD: 13.67%
• 1Y: 25.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSM vs. IQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus	8.50%	21.84%	11.81%
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.67%	17.11%	14.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CSM and IQQQ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024	0.88

The correlation between CSM and IQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CSM vs. IQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSM

CSM Risk / Return Rank: 68
CSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CSM Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
CSM Martin Ratio Rank: 68

IQQQ

IQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 54
IQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
IQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
IQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
IQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
IQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSM vs. IQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSM	IQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.48	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	1.99	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.26	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	2.34	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.80	7.74	+2.06

CSM vs. IQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the IQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSM and IQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSM vs. IQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSM drawdown since its inception was -36.11%, which is greater than IQQQ's maximum drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSM and IQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSM	IQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.11%	-20.41%	-15.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.40%	-11.13%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.28%	-4.54%	+3.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	-3.63%	-0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	3.36%	-1.06%

Volatility

CSM vs. IQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Proshares Large Cap Core Plus (CSM) is 3.67%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that CSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSM	IQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	7.78%	-4.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.56%	14.34%	-4.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.37%	17.62%	-5.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.18%	19.16%	-1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.36%	19.16%	-0.80%

CSM vs. IQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQQ's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSM vs. IQQQ - Dividend Comparison

CSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than IQQQ's 5.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSM Proshares Large Cap Core Plus	1.04%	1.04%	1.06%	1.17%	1.37%	0.78%	1.21%	1.41%	1.54%	1.28%	1.49%	1.67%
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	5.25%	10.34%	7.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSM and IQQQ in my portfolio?

CSM and IQQQ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSM or IQQQ?

IQQQ has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to CSM (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSM dropped -36.11% vs IQQQ's -20.41%.

Which ETF is better, CSM or IQQQ?

On 1-year performance, IQQQ leads with 25.95% vs 22.48% for CSM. On fees, CSM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSM or IQQQ?

Over the 1-year period, IQQQ has performed better with a 25.95% return vs 22.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSM or IQQQ?

CSM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSM or IQQQ?

IQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.25%, compared with 1.04% for CSM.

What is the main difference between CSM and IQQQ?

CSM is categorized as Long-Short, while IQQQ is Nasdaq-100. CSM tracks Credit Suisse 130/30 Large-Cap Index, while IQQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CSM and 0.55% for IQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.