PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CSKR.L vs. PAXG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CSKR.L vs. PAXG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSKR.L (iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc)) and PAXG.L (Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - CSKR.L tracks the MSCI Korea NR USD while PAXG.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSKR.L returned 18.48%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for PAXG.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSKR.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for PAXG.L.

Performance

CSKR.L vs. PAXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSKR.L is traded in USD, while PAXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PAXG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSKR.L achieves a 106.37% return, which is significantly higher than PAXG.L's 8.57% return.

CSKR.L

1D
-4.80%
1M
15.77%
YTD
106.37%
6M
126.95%
1Y
232.60%
3Y*
49.13%
5Y*
18.48%
10Y*
17.00%

PAXG.L

1D
-0.82%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
8.57%
6M
6.77%
1Y
12.62%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSKR.L vs. PAXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSKR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc)		106.37%99.44%-22.66%19.75%-28.52%-8.24%44.24%10.58%-19.38%44.22%
PAXG.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS		8.57%16.83%-0.21%2.59%-10.69%-1.18%4.58%8.02%-6.39%14.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CSKR.L and PAXG.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2016

0.27

Over the past year, CSKR.L and PAXG.L have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

CSKR.L vs. PAXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CSKR.L
PAXG.L

Technology

58.7%
1.1%

Industrials

16.9%
8.5%

Financial Services

8.8%
46.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
6.0%

Healthcare

2.7%
3.7%

Communication Services

2.3%
2.7%

Basic Materials

1.7%
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
3.0%

Energy

0.9%
2.9%

Utilities

0.3%
3.6%

Real Estate

-

7.8%

Technology

CSKR.L
58.7%
PAXG.L
1.1%

Industrials

CSKR.L
16.9%
PAXG.L
8.5%

Financial Services

CSKR.L
8.8%
PAXG.L
46.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CSKR.L
6.4%
PAXG.L
6.0%

Healthcare

CSKR.L
2.7%
PAXG.L
3.7%

Communication Services

CSKR.L
2.3%
PAXG.L
2.7%

Basic Materials

CSKR.L
1.7%
PAXG.L
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

CSKR.L
1.2%
PAXG.L
3.0%

Energy

CSKR.L
0.9%
PAXG.L
2.9%

Utilities

CSKR.L
0.3%
PAXG.L
3.6%

Real Estate

CSKR.L

-

PAXG.L
7.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc)

Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS

Often compared with CSKR.L:
CSKR.L vs. TDGB.LCSKR.L vs. EWYCSKR.L vs. BNDCSKR.L vs. IUCD.LCSKR.L vs. FBTU.LCSKR.L vs. AINF.LCSKR.L vs. IEVL.L
Often compared with PAXG.L:
PAXG.L vs. XDJP.LPAXG.L vs. CSJP.LPAXG.L vs. LCCN.LPAXG.L vs. AIL.DEPAXG.L vs. ESIF.LPAXG.L vs. FRQX.LPAXG.L vs. FRXT.L

Return for Risk

CSKR.L vs. PAXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CSKR.L
CSKR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CSKR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSKR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSKR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CSKR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSKR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
PAXG.L
PAXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSKR.L vs. PAXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CSKR.LPAXG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
5.87
0.94

+4.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.41
1.44

+3.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.17

+0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.97

1.39

+8.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.50

3.96

+33.54

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSKR.L vs. PAXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSKR.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.87, which is higher than the PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSKR.L and PAXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CSKR.LPAXG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.87

0.94

+4.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.06

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.32

+0.22

Drawdowns

CSKR.L vs. PAXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSKR.L drawdown since its inception was -50.88%, which is greater than PAXG.L's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSKR.L and PAXG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CSKR.LPAXG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.88%

-37.04%

-13.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.16%

-9.02%

-14.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.22%

-23.28%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.14%

-29.56%

-19.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.88%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.91%

-3.57%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.48%

-11.15%

-10.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.17%

3.18%

+2.99%

Volatility

CSKR.L vs. PAXG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L) has a higher volatility of 18.32% compared to Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) at 4.10%. This indicates that CSKR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CSKR.LPAXG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.32%

4.10%

+14.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.47%

10.91%

+23.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.40%

13.37%

+26.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.89%

21.69%

+7.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.26%

26.87%

+2.39%

CSKR.L vs. PAXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSKR.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXG.L's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSKR.L vs. PAXG.L - Dividend Comparison

CSKR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CSKR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAXG.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS		0.03%0.03%0.06%0.04%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

CSKR.L and PAXG.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAXG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAXG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSKR.L.

CSKR.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD, while PAXG.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSKR.L and 0.12% for PAXG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSKR.L and PAXG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer