CSKR.L vs. IUIT.L
CSKR.L (iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IUIT.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSKR.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea NR USD, while IUIT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSKR.L returned 17.00%/yr vs 26.33%/yr for IUIT.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSKR.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUIT.L.
Performance
CSKR.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSKR.L achieves a 106.37% return, which is significantly higher than IUIT.L's 23.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CSKR.L has underperformed IUIT.L with an annualized return of 17.00%, while IUIT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 26.33% annualized return.
CSKR.L
- 1D
- -4.80%
- 1M
- 15.77%
- YTD
- 106.37%
- 6M
- 126.95%
- 1Y
- 232.60%
- 3Y*
- 49.13%
- 5Y*
- 18.48%
- 10Y*
- 17.00%
IUIT.L
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- 13.14%
- YTD
- 23.04%
- 6M
- 22.75%
- 1Y
- 51.87%
- 3Y*
- 34.42%
- 5Y*
- 24.18%
- 10Y*
- 26.33%
CSKR.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSKR.L iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) | 106.37% | 99.44% | -22.66% | 19.75% | -28.52% | -8.24% | 44.24% | 10.58% | -19.38% | 44.22% |
IUIT.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 23.04% | 22.93% | 38.51% | 59.45% | -29.15% | 34.09% | 43.14% | 48.90% | -1.41% | 38.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSKR.L and IUIT.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2015 | 0.46 |
The correlation between CSKR.L and IUIT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CSKR.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSKR.L
IUIT.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
CSKR.L
IUIT.L
Industrials
CSKR.L
IUIT.L
Financial Services
CSKR.L
IUIT.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
CSKR.L
IUIT.L
-
Healthcare
CSKR.L
IUIT.L
-
Communication Services
CSKR.L
IUIT.L
-
Basic Materials
CSKR.L
IUIT.L
-
Consumer Defensive
CSKR.L
IUIT.L
-
Energy
CSKR.L
IUIT.L
Utilities
CSKR.L
IUIT.L
-
Real Estate
CSKR.L
-
IUIT.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSKR.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSKR.L
IUIT.L
CSKR.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSKR.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.79 | 1.41 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.97 | 3.03 | +6.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.50 | 8.99 | +28.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSKR.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.87 | 2.55 | +3.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 1.02 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 1.20 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.16 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
CSKR.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSKR.L drawdown since its inception was -50.88%, which is greater than IUIT.L's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSKR.L and IUIT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSKR.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.88% | -33.46% | -17.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.16% | -17.03% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.22% | -26.40% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.14% | -33.46% | -15.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.88% | -33.46% | -17.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -3.14% | -2.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.48% | -6.02% | -15.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.17% | 5.76% | +0.41% |
Volatility
CSKR.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L) has a higher volatility of 18.32% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) at 7.49%. This indicates that CSKR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSKR.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.32% | 7.49% | +10.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.47% | 15.53% | +18.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.40% | 20.28% | +19.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.89% | 23.61% | +5.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 22.47% | +6.79% |
CSKR.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSKR.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSKR.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSKR.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSKR.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSKR.L.
CSKR.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. CSKR.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSKR.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.
Find the right allocation for CSKR.L and IUIT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer