PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CSKR.L vs. IKOR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CSKR.L vs. IKOR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSKR.L (iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IKOR.L (iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares tracking the MSCI Korea NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSKR.L returned 17.00%/yr vs 17.04%/yr for IKOR.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSKR.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IKOR.L.

Performance

CSKR.L vs. IKOR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSKR.L is traded in USD, while IKOR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IKOR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSKR.L having a 106.37% return and IKOR.L slightly higher at 107.15%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSKR.L having a 17.00% annualized return and IKOR.L not far ahead at 17.04%.

CSKR.L

1D
-4.80%
1M
15.77%
YTD
106.37%
6M
126.95%
1Y
232.60%
3Y*
49.13%
5Y*
18.48%
10Y*
17.00%

IKOR.L

1D
-4.01%
1M
16.39%
YTD
107.15%
6M
127.98%
1Y
234.04%
3Y*
49.11%
5Y*
18.64%
10Y*
17.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSKR.L vs. IKOR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSKR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc)		106.37%99.44%-22.66%19.75%-28.52%-8.24%44.24%10.58%-19.38%44.22%
IKOR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)		107.15%99.99%-22.86%19.29%-28.34%-8.14%43.35%11.69%-21.58%45.06%

Correlation

The correlation between CSKR.L and IKOR.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2014

0.79

The correlation between CSKR.L and IKOR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.98 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CSKR.L vs. IKOR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CSKR.L
IKOR.L

Technology

58.7%
56.0%

Industrials

16.9%
18.8%

Financial Services

8.8%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
5.7%

Healthcare

2.7%
3.0%

Communication Services

2.3%
2.6%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
1.4%

Energy

0.9%
1.1%

Utilities

0.3%
0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

CSKR.L
58.7%
IKOR.L
56.0%

Industrials

CSKR.L
16.9%
IKOR.L
18.8%

Financial Services

CSKR.L
8.8%
IKOR.L
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CSKR.L
6.4%
IKOR.L
5.7%

Healthcare

CSKR.L
2.7%
IKOR.L
3.0%

Communication Services

CSKR.L
2.3%
IKOR.L
2.6%

Basic Materials

CSKR.L
1.7%
IKOR.L
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

CSKR.L
1.2%
IKOR.L
1.4%

Energy

CSKR.L
0.9%
IKOR.L
1.1%

Utilities

CSKR.L
0.3%
IKOR.L
0.4%

Real Estate

CSKR.L

-

IKOR.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc)

iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)

Often compared with CSKR.L:
CSKR.L vs. TDGB.LCSKR.L vs. EWYCSKR.L vs. BNDCSKR.L vs. IUCD.LCSKR.L vs. FBTU.LCSKR.L vs. AINF.LCSKR.L vs. IEVL.L
Often compared with IKOR.L:
IKOR.L vs. VOOIKOR.L vs. EWYIKOR.L vs. FLRK.LIKOR.L vs. FRXT.LIKOR.L vs. XMID.LIKOR.L vs. CP9U.LIKOR.L vs. AUAD.L

Return for Risk

CSKR.L vs. IKOR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CSKR.L
CSKR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CSKR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSKR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSKR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CSKR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSKR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
IKOR.L
IKOR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IKOR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSKR.L vs. IKOR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CSKR.LIKOR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
5.87
5.98

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.41
5.53

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.78

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.97

10.10

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.50

37.73

-0.22

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSKR.L vs. IKOR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSKR.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.87, which is comparable to the IKOR.L Sharpe Ratio of 5.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSKR.L and IKOR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CSKR.LIKOR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.87

5.98

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.68

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.66

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.28

+0.26

Drawdowns

CSKR.L vs. IKOR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSKR.L drawdown since its inception was -50.88%, smaller than the maximum IKOR.L drawdown of -72.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSKR.L and IKOR.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CSKR.LIKOR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.88%

-72.59%

+21.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.16%

-23.01%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.22%

-29.02%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.14%

-48.94%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.88%

-50.49%

-0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.91%

-5.31%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.48%

-22.00%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.17%

6.17%

0.00%

Volatility

CSKR.L vs. IKOR.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L) have volatilities of 18.32% and 18.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CSKR.LIKOR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.32%

18.19%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.47%

33.92%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.40%

38.91%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.89%

27.60%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.26%

26.33%

+2.93%

CSKR.L vs. IKOR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSKR.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than IKOR.L's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSKR.L vs. IKOR.L - Dividend Comparison

CSKR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IKOR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSKR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IKOR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)		0.42%0.83%1.31%1.14%1.34%1.36%0.76%1.28%1.07%0.72%0.57%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.98, CSKR.L and IKOR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CSKR.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSKR.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IKOR.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Korea NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSKR.L and 0.74% for IKOR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSKR.L and IKOR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer