CSJZX vs. QREARX
CSJZX (Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z) and QREARX (TIAA Real Estate Account) are both REIT funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CSJZX returned 10.97% vs 3.23% for QREARX. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. CSJZX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QREARX.
Performance
CSJZX vs. QREARX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSJZX achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly higher than QREARX's 0.95% return.
CSJZX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 10.97%
- 3Y*
- 10.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- —
QREARX
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 3.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSJZX vs. QREARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSJZX Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z | 11.58% | 2.48% |
QREARX TIAA Real Estate Account | 0.95% | 3.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSJZX and QREARX is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSJZX vs. QREARX — Risk / Return Rank
CSJZX
QREARX
CSJZX vs. QREARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z (CSJZX) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSJZX | QREARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 4.27 | -3.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 6.52 | -5.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 2.49 | -1.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 8.91 | -7.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 32.47 | -28.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSJZX | QREARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 4.27 | -3.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 2.12 | -1.85 |
Drawdowns
CSJZX vs. QREARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSJZX drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than QREARX's maximum drawdown of -1.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSJZX and QREARX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSJZX | QREARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -1.45% | -40.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.77% | -0.37% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -0.06% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.45% | -0.06% | -11.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 0.10% | +2.88% |
Volatility
CSJZX vs. QREARX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z (CSJZX) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) at 0.12%. This indicates that CSJZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QREARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSJZX | QREARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 0.12% | +3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.15% | 0.45% | +9.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.49% | 0.77% | +12.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 1.66% | +16.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 1.66% | +21.31% |
CSJZX vs. QREARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSJZX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than QREARX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSJZX vs. QREARX - Dividend Comparison
CSJZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, while QREARX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSJZX Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class Z | 2.79% | 3.05% | 2.82% | 3.54% | 7.57% | 3.72% | 2.58% | 8.65% |
QREARX TIAA Real Estate Account | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSJZX and QREARX have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSJZX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to QREARX (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSJZX dropped -41.66% vs QREARX's -1.45%.
QREARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSJZX and QREARX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer