PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSJP.L vs. LGJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSJP.L is traded in GBp, while LGJP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LGJP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSJP.L having a 12.42% return and LGJP.L slightly higher at 12.60%.


CSJP.L

1D
-2.12%
1M
-6.12%
6M
5.57%
YTD
12.42%
1Y
30.00%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
8.59%

LGJP.L

1D
-1.94%
1M
-5.49%
6M
5.89%
YTD
12.60%
1Y
29.38%
3Y*
15.18%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CSJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.42%17.48%9.01%13.68%-7.33%1.76%12.16%13.94%-5.04%
LGJP.L
L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.60%16.72%10.25%14.24%-6.86%2.01%13.16%14.08%-5.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CSJP.L and LGJP.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018

0.93

The correlation between CSJP.L and LGJP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSJP.L vs. LGJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSJP.L
CSJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CSJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

LGJP.L
LGJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSJP.LLGJP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.72

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.52

8.34

+0.18

CSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSJP.L and LGJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSJP.L drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, which is greater than LGJP.L's maximum drawdown of -23.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSJP.L and LGJP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSJP.LLGJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.79%

-23.10%

-13.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.49%

-10.76%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

-13.79%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.68%

-18.15%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.40%

-6.88%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.91%

-4.98%

-4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

3.51%

0.00%

Volatility

CSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGJP.L) have volatilities of 6.52% and 6.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSJP.LLGJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

6.47%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

17.01%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

20.11%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

16.82%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.00%

17.44%

-1.44%

CSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSJP.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than LGJP.L's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSJP.L vs. LGJP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSJP.L nor LGJP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, CSJP.L and LGJP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LGJP.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGJP.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for CSJP.L.

CSJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while LGJP.L tracks Solactive Core Japan Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for CSJP.L and 0.10% for LGJP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSJP.L and LGJP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer