CSJP.L vs. LGJG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSJP.L (iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and LGJG.L (L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from iShares and Legal & General respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSJP.L returned 10.06%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for LGJG.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSJP.L charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGJG.L.

Performance

CSJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSJP.L achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly higher than LGJG.L's 14.69% return.

CSJP.L

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 6.26%
• YTD: 16.41%
• 6M: 15.60%
• 1Y: 34.17%
• 3Y*: 15.57%
• 5Y*: 10.06%
• 10Y*: 10.09%

LGJG.L

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 6.18%
• YTD: 14.69%
• 6M: 14.39%
• 1Y: 31.74%
• 3Y*: 15.35%
• 5Y*: 10.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CSJP.L iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	16.41%	17.48%	9.01%	13.68%	-7.33%	1.76%	12.16%	10.62%
LGJG.L L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF	14.69%	17.46%	10.01%	13.64%	-6.84%	1.78%	13.24%	11.39%

Correlation

The correlation between CSJP.L and LGJG.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2019	0.94

The correlation between CSJP.L and LGJG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CSJP.L	LGJG.L
Industrials	24.5%	24.2%
Technology	20.8%	19.8%
Financial Services	17.8%	17.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.9%	12.5%
Communication Services	8.8%	8.5%
Healthcare	5.9%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	3.7%
Basic Materials	3.0%	3.8%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.7%
Utilities	1.0%	1.0%
Energy	1.0%	0.7%

Return for Risk

CSJP.L vs. LGJG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSJP.L

CSJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
CSJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CSJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
CSJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CSJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
CSJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

LGJG.L

LGJG.L Risk / Return Rank: 56
LGJG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
LGJG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
LGJG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 56
LGJG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
LGJG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSJP.L	LGJG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.79	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	2.57	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.34	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	2.86	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.33	9.27	+1.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the LGJG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSJP.L and LGJG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSJP.L	LGJG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	1.79	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.65	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.64	-0.01

Drawdowns

CSJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSJP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.31%, which is greater than LGJG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSJP.L and LGJG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSJP.L	LGJG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.31%	-22.92%	-1.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.49%	-11.04%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.32%	-13.84%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.68%	-18.20%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.18%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.10%	-5.15%	-0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	3.42%	-0.12%

Volatility

CSJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L) have volatilities of 3.77% and 3.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSJP.L	LGJG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.77%	3.71%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.90%	14.24%	+0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.35%	17.63%	+0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.88%	15.58%	+0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.96%	16.81%	-0.85%

CSJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSJP.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than LGJG.L's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSJP.L nor LGJG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSJP.L and LGJG.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, CSJP.L and LGJG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CSJP.L or LGJG.L?

On fees, LGJG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSJP.L or LGJG.L?

LGJG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for CSJP.L.

What is the main difference between CSJP.L and LGJG.L?

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for CSJP.L and 0.10% for LGJG.L.