PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSJP.L vs. HPJS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSJP.L is traded in GBp, while HPJS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HPJS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSJP.L achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly higher than HPJS.L's 8.46% return.


CSJP.L

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.26%
YTD
16.41%
6M
15.60%
1Y
34.17%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
10.09%

HPJS.L

1D
-1.17%
1M
3.06%
YTD
8.46%
6M
6.41%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
7.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CSJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
16.41%17.48%9.01%13.68%-7.33%-3.06%
HPJS.L
HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF
8.46%14.99%-1.51%9.90%-15.00%-3.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CSJP.L and HPJS.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2021

0.92

The correlation between CSJP.L and HPJS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSJP.L vs. HPJS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSJP.L
CSJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CSJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

HPJS.L
HPJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HPJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSJP.LHPJS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.04

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.33

6.70

+3.63

CSJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the HPJS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSJP.L and HPJS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSJP.LHPJS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.35

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.15

+0.48

Drawdowns

CSJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSJP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.31%, roughly equal to the maximum HPJS.L drawdown of -24.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSJP.L and HPJS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSJP.LHPJS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.31%

-24.65%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.49%

-12.22%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

-17.24%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-1.70%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-11.45%

+5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

3.72%

-0.42%

Volatility

CSJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) is 3.77%, while HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJS.L) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that CSJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HPJS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSJP.LHPJS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

4.72%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

14.68%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.35%

18.43%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

15.94%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.96%

15.94%

+0.02%

CSJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSJP.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than HPJS.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSJP.L nor HPJS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CSJP.L and HPJS.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HPJS.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HPJS.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for CSJP.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for CSJP.L and 0.18% for HPJS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSJP.L and HPJS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer