PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSJP.L vs. DXJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSJP.L vs. DXJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (DXJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSJP.L achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly lower than DXJP.L's 20.87% return. Over the past 10 years, CSJP.L has underperformed DXJP.L with an annualized return of 10.09%, while DXJP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.93% annualized return.


CSJP.L

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.26%
YTD
16.41%
6M
15.60%
1Y
34.17%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
10.09%

DXJP.L

1D
0.62%
1M
6.69%
YTD
20.87%
6M
24.40%
1Y
56.54%
3Y*
33.50%
5Y*
25.49%
10Y*
16.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSJP.L vs. DXJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
16.41%17.48%9.01%13.68%-7.33%1.76%12.16%13.94%-8.52%13.00%
DXJP.L
WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
20.87%33.41%28.49%40.34%4.78%16.94%3.19%14.23%-20.57%20.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CSJP.L and DXJP.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2015

0.72

The correlation between CSJP.L and DXJP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (10 years) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CSJP.L vs. DXJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSJP.L
DXJP.L

Industrials

24.5%
28.3%

Technology

20.8%
12.8%

Financial Services

17.8%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
16.4%

Communication Services

8.8%
4.0%

Healthcare

5.9%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
2.6%

Basic Materials

3.0%
7.5%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Utilities

1.0%

-

Energy

1.0%
2.0%

Industrials

CSJP.L
24.5%
DXJP.L
28.3%

Technology

CSJP.L
20.8%
DXJP.L
12.8%

Financial Services

CSJP.L
17.8%
DXJP.L
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

CSJP.L
11.9%
DXJP.L
16.4%

Communication Services

CSJP.L
8.8%
DXJP.L
4.0%

Healthcare

CSJP.L
5.9%
DXJP.L
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

CSJP.L
3.5%
DXJP.L
2.6%

Basic Materials

CSJP.L
3.0%
DXJP.L
7.5%

Real Estate

CSJP.L
1.9%
DXJP.L

-

Utilities

CSJP.L
1.0%
DXJP.L

-

Energy

CSJP.L
1.0%
DXJP.L
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSJP.L vs. DXJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSJP.L
CSJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CSJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJP.L
DXJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DXJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSJP.L vs. DXJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) and WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (DXJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSJP.LDXJP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.53

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

5.60

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.33

19.40

-9.07

CSJP.L vs. DXJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the DXJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSJP.L and DXJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSJP.LDXJP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.96

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

1.34

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.87

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.69

-0.06

Drawdowns

CSJP.L vs. DXJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSJP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.31%, smaller than the maximum DXJP.L drawdown of -41.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSJP.L and DXJP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSJP.LDXJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.31%

-41.75%

+17.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.49%

-10.06%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

-22.88%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.68%

-22.88%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.31%

-41.75%

+17.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-8.44%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

2.91%

+0.39%

Volatility

CSJP.L vs. DXJP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSJP.L) is 3.77%, while WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (DXJP.L) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that CSJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSJP.LDXJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

4.24%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

15.02%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.35%

19.06%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

19.04%

-3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.96%

19.44%

-3.48%

CSJP.L vs. DXJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSJP.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than DXJP.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSJP.L vs. DXJP.L - Dividend Comparison

CSJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DXJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CSJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DXJP.L
WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
1.40%1.58%1.61%1.92%2.49%1.62%1.97%2.26%2.41%1.34%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSJP.L and DXJP.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DXJP.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DXJP.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for CSJP.L.

CSJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while DXJP.L tracks WisdomTree Japan Equity Index (GBP Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for CSJP.L and 0.45% for DXJP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSJP.L and DXJP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer