CSIBX vs. TIBDX
CSIBX (Calvert Bond Fund) and TIBDX (TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, CSIBX returned 1.90%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for TIBDX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CSIBX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TIBDX.
Performance
CSIBX vs. TIBDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSIBX achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly lower than TIBDX's -0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CSIBX has outperformed TIBDX with an annualized return of 1.90%, while TIBDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.71% annualized return.
CSIBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 1Y
- 1.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.23%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.26%
TIBDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.85%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- 1.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CSIBX Calvert Bond Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CSIBX vs. TIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSIBX Calvert Bond Fund | -0.87% | 7.93% | 2.45% | 6.55% | -12.85% | 0.11% | 7.39% | 8.44% | -0.16% | 4.19% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | -0.38% | 7.38% | 1.95% | 5.63% | -13.68% | -0.95% | 8.10% | 9.57% | -0.64% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSIBX and TIBDX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 1999 | 0.89 |
The correlation between CSIBX and TIBDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSIBX vs. TIBDX — Risk / Return Rank
CSIBX
TIBDX
CSIBX vs. TIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSIBX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.17 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 1.22 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.37 | 3.25 | -0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSIBX vs. TIBDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSIBX drawdown since its inception was -17.57%, smaller than the maximum TIBDX drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIBX and TIBDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSIBX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.57% | -18.82% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.14% | -2.98% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.15% | -5.35% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.57% | -18.82% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.57% | -18.82% | +1.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -2.25% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -2.30% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 1.12% | +0.14% |
Volatility
CSIBX vs. TIBDX - Volatility Comparison
Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) at 0.88%. This indicates that CSIBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSIBX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 0.88% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 3.00% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.88% | 3.77% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.52% | 5.65% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.56% | 4.74% | -0.18% |
CSIBX vs. TIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSIBX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBDX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSIBX vs. TIBDX - Dividend Comparison
CSIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than TIBDX's 4.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSIBX Calvert Bond Fund | 3.97% | 4.35% | 4.18% | 3.28% | 2.34% | 3.12% | 3.39% | 3.43% | 2.49% | 2.22% | 2.58% | 2.45% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 4.15% | 4.34% | 3.60% | 3.22% | 2.44% | 2.39% | 4.45% | 3.09% | 2.88% | 2.93% | 3.80% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, CSIBX and TIBDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CSIBX has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to TIBDX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSIBX dropped -17.57% vs TIBDX's -18.82%.
TIBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSIBX and TIBDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer