CSHP vs. VGUS
CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) and VGUS (Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. CSHP is actively managed, while VGUS is passively managed. Over the past year, CSHP returned 3.94% vs 3.93% for VGUS. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSHP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VGUS.
Performance
CSHP vs. VGUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSHP achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than VGUS's 1.46% return.
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGUS
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP vs. VGUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.62% | 3.58% |
VGUS Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF | 1.46% | 3.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSHP and VGUS is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSHP vs. VGUS — Risk / Return Rank
CSHP
VGUS
CSHP vs. VGUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) and Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF (VGUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSHP | VGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 7.26 | 10.84 | -3.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 65.45 | 54.18 | +11.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 428.15 | 411.30 | +16.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSHP | VGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82 | 12.05 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 10.70 | 11.74 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
CSHP vs. VGUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSHP drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, which is greater than VGUS's maximum drawdown of -0.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHP and VGUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSHP | VGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.07% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.06% | -0.07% | +0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | 0.00% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
Volatility
CSHP vs. VGUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) is 0.08%, while Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF (VGUS) has a volatility of 0.11%. This indicates that CSHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSHP | VGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 0.11% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.24% | 0.18% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33% | 0.33% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.40% | 0.34% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.40% | 0.34% | +0.06% |
CSHP vs. VGUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSHP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VGUS's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSHP vs. VGUS - Dividend Comparison
CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than VGUS's 3.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.92% | 5.39% | 1.96% |
VGUS Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF | 3.61% | 3.12% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSHP and VGUS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGUS has higher volatility (0.11%) compared to CSHP (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSHP dropped -0.08% vs VGUS's -0.07%.
On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.94% vs 3.93% for VGUS. On fees, VGUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.94% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 3.61% for VGUS.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CSHP and 0.07% for VGUS.
VGUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.05 vs 11.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSHP and VGUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer