CSH2.L vs. LYM9.DE
CSH2.L (Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc) and LYM9.DE (Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - CSH2.L is a Money Market fund tracking the SONIA Compounded (GBP Hedged), while LYM9.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSH2.L returned 2.12%/yr vs 10.29%/yr for LYM9.DE. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. CSH2.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LYM9.DE.
Performance
CSH2.L vs. LYM9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSH2.L is traded in GBp, while LYM9.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYM9.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSH2.L achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly lower than LYM9.DE's 23.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CSH2.L has underperformed LYM9.DE with an annualized return of 2.12%, while LYM9.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.29% annualized return.
CSH2.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.76%
- 10Y*
- 2.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.98%
LYM9.DE
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -12.73%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- YTD
- 23.64%
- 1Y
- 51.28%
- 3Y*
- 6.68%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.60%
CSH2.L vs. LYM9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSH2.L Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc | 2.24% | 4.67% | 5.61% | 4.72% | 1.54% | 0.13% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.70% | 0.42% |
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist | 23.64% | 36.38% | -11.99% | -22.75% | -8.36% | -6.00% | 54.33% | 42.23% | -7.88% | 20.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSH2.L and LYM9.DE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSH2.L vs. LYM9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSH2.L
LYM9.DE
CSH2.L vs. LYM9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) and Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSH2.L | LYM9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +13.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.37 | 1.38 | +3.99 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 27.30 | 3.63 | +23.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 174.87 | 14.02 | +160.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSH2.L vs. LYM9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSH2.L drawdown since its inception was -0.37%, smaller than the maximum LYM9.DE drawdown of -69.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH2.L and LYM9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSH2.L | LYM9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | -69.68% | +69.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.16% | -14.04% | +13.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.29% | -39.40% | +39.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.29% | -54.91% | +54.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.37% | -55.42% | +55.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.49% | +13.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -38.30% | +38.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 3.65% | -3.63% |
Volatility
CSH2.L vs. LYM9.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) is 0.05%, while Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE) has a volatility of 8.49%. This indicates that CSH2.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYM9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSH2.L | LYM9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | 8.49% | -8.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.19% | 18.57% | -18.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49% | 22.33% | -21.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.56% | 22.41% | -21.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.44% | 21.85% | -21.41% |
CSH2.L vs. LYM9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSH2.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LYM9.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSH2.L vs. LYM9.DE - Dividend Comparison
CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYM9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSH2.L Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.42% | 0.74% | 0.78% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.70% | 1.12% | 0.67% | 0.89% | 1.50% | 2.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSH2.L and LYM9.DE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSH2.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSH2.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LYM9.DE.
CSH2.L is categorized as Money Market, while LYM9.DE is Energy Equities. CSH2.L tracks SONIA Compounded (GBP Hedged), while LYM9.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSH2.L and 0.60% for LYM9.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSH2.L and LYM9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer