CSH2.L vs. ISPA.DE
CSH2.L (Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc) and ISPA.DE (iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSH2.L is a Money Market fund tracking the SONIA Compounded (GBP Hedged), while ISPA.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Select Dividend 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSH2.L returned 2.12%/yr vs 8.84%/yr for ISPA.DE. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. CSH2.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for ISPA.DE.
Performance
CSH2.L vs. ISPA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSH2.L is traded in GBp, while ISPA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ISPA.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSH2.L achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly lower than ISPA.DE's 15.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CSH2.L has underperformed ISPA.DE with an annualized return of 2.12%, while ISPA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.84% annualized return.
CSH2.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.76%
- 10Y*
- 2.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.98%
ISPA.DE
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- YTD
- 15.03%
- 1Y
- 29.91%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.70%
CSH2.L vs. ISPA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSH2.L Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc | 2.24% | 4.67% | 5.61% | 4.72% | 1.54% | 0.13% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.70% | 0.42% |
ISPA.DE iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) | 15.03% | 25.95% | 8.04% | 2.69% | 3.46% | 14.14% | -3.99% | 17.77% | -5.66% | 7.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSH2.L and ISPA.DE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015 | -0.01 |
The correlation between CSH2.L and ISPA.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (5 years) to 0.08 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSH2.L vs. ISPA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSH2.L
ISPA.DE
CSH2.L vs. ISPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSH2.L | ISPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +11.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.37 | 1.63 | +3.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 27.30 | 6.62 | +20.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 174.87 | 24.11 | +150.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSH2.L vs. ISPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSH2.L drawdown since its inception was -0.37%, smaller than the maximum ISPA.DE drawdown of -32.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH2.L and ISPA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSH2.L | ISPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | -32.65% | +32.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.16% | -4.50% | +4.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.29% | -12.88% | +12.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.29% | -15.30% | +15.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.37% | -32.65% | +32.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.37% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -4.25% | +4.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 1.24% | -1.22% |
Volatility
CSH2.L vs. ISPA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) is 0.05%, while iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE) has a volatility of 2.04%. This indicates that CSH2.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISPA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSH2.L | ISPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | 2.04% | -1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.19% | 6.63% | -6.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49% | 8.60% | -8.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.56% | 11.64% | -11.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.44% | 14.36% | -13.92% |
CSH2.L vs. ISPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSH2.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ISPA.DE's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSH2.L vs. ISPA.DE - Dividend Comparison
CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISPA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSH2.L Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISPA.DE iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) | 3.92% | 4.52% | 4.89% | 5.91% | 4.87% | 3.31% | 4.04% | 4.02% | 4.01% | 5.66% | 3.64% | 4.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSH2.L and ISPA.DE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSH2.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSH2.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for ISPA.DE.
CSH2.L is categorized as Money Market, while ISPA.DE is Global Equities. CSH2.L tracks SONIA Compounded (GBP Hedged), while ISPA.DE tracks STOXX Global Select Dividend 100. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSH2.L and 0.46% for ISPA.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSH2.L and ISPA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer