PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSH2.L vs. HDEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSH2.L vs. HDEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) and Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSH2.L achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly lower than HDEM.L's 7.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CSH2.L has underperformed HDEM.L with an annualized return of 2.09%, while HDEM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.43% annualized return.


CSH2.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.93%
6M
1.99%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
2.09%

HDEM.L

1D
-1.04%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
7.37%
6M
8.55%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
7.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSH2.L vs. HDEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSH2.L
Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc
1.93%4.67%5.61%4.72%1.54%0.13%0.30%0.82%0.70%0.42%
HDEM.L
Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
7.37%18.32%3.91%3.74%-6.40%15.10%-10.00%11.46%-1.01%14.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CSH2.L and HDEM.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2016

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSH2.L vs. HDEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSH2.L
CSH2.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

HDEM.L
HDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSH2.L vs. HDEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) and Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSH2.LHDEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+12.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.49

1.37

+3.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

27.47

4.26

+23.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

160.87

10.91

+149.97

CSH2.L vs. HDEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio is 8.13, which is higher than the HDEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSH2.L and HDEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSH2.L vs. HDEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSH2.L drawdown since its inception was -0.37%, smaller than the maximum HDEM.L drawdown of -32.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH2.L and HDEM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSH2.LHDEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-32.18%

+31.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.16%

-5.28%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.29%

-12.22%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.29%

-18.05%

+17.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.37%

-32.18%

+31.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.58%

+4.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-7.67%

+7.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

2.06%

-2.03%

Volatility

CSH2.L vs. HDEM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) is 0.06%, while Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that CSH2.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSH2.LHDEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

3.60%

-3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.23%

7.57%

-7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53%

10.44%

-9.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.56%

13.55%

-12.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.44%

15.73%

-15.29%

CSH2.L vs. HDEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSH2.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HDEM.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSH2.L vs. HDEM.L - Dividend Comparison

CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CSH2.L
Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDEM.L
Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
4.91%5.18%5.61%6.08%8.92%5.96%4.31%5.23%5.37%5.06%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSH2.L and HDEM.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSH2.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSH2.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HDEM.L.

CSH2.L is categorized as Money Market, while HDEM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. CSH2.L tracks SONIA Compounded (GBP Hedged), while HDEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSH2.L and 0.49% for HDEM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSH2.L and HDEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer